Kendzor Darla E, Businelle Michael S, Poonawalla Insiya B, Cuate Erica L, Kesh Anshula, Rios Debra M, Ma Ping, Balis David S
Darla E. Kendzor, Michael S. Businelle, Insiya B. Poonawalla, Erica L. Cuate, Anshula Kesh, and Debra M. Rios are with the University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, Dallas. Ping Ma is with the Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. Davis S. Balis is with the Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun;105(6):1198-205. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302102. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
We evaluated the effectiveness of offering adjunctive financial incentives for abstinence (contingency management [CM]) within a safety net hospital smoking cessation program.
We randomized participants (n = 146) from a Dallas County, Texas, Tobacco Cessation Clinic from 2011 to 2013 to usual care (UC; cessation program; n = 71) or CM (UC + 4 weeks of financial incentives; n = 75), and followed from 1 week before the quit date through 4 weeks after the quit date. A subset (n = 128) was asked to attend a visit 12 weeks after the scheduled quit date.
Participants were primarily Black (62.3%) or White (28.1%) and female (57.5%). Most participants were uninsured (52.1%) and had an annual household income of less than $12 000 (55.5%). Abstinence rates were significantly higher for those assigned to CM than UC at all visits following the quit date (all Ps < .05). Point prevalence abstinence rates in the CM and UC groups were 49.3% versus 25.4% at 4 weeks after the quit date and 32.8% versus 14.1% at 12 weeks after the quit date. CM participants earned an average of $63.40 ($150 possible) for abstinence during the first 4 weeks after the scheduled quit date.
Offering small financial incentives for abstinence might be an effective means to improve abstinence rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals participating in smoking cessation treatment.
我们评估了在一家安全网医院的戒烟项目中提供戒烟辅助经济激励措施(应急管理[CM])的有效性。
我们将2011年至2013年来自德克萨斯州达拉斯县烟草戒烟诊所的参与者(n = 146)随机分为常规护理组(UC;戒烟项目;n = 71)或CM组(UC + 4周经济激励;n = 75),并从戒烟日期前1周跟踪至戒烟日期后4周。一个子集(n = 128)被要求在预定戒烟日期后12周参加一次随访。
参与者主要为黑人(62.3%)或白人(28.1%),女性占57.5%。大多数参与者未参保(52.1%),家庭年收入低于12000美元(55.5%)。在戒烟日期后的所有随访中,分配到CM组的参与者的戒烟率显著高于UC组(所有P值<0.05)。戒烟日期后4周时,CM组和UC组的点流行率戒烟率分别为49.3%和25.4%;戒烟日期后12周时,分别为32.8%和14.1%。CM组参与者在预定戒烟日期后的前4周内,因戒烟平均赚取了63.40美元(可能赚取150美元)。
提供小额戒烟经济激励措施可能是提高参与戒烟治疗的社会经济弱势群体戒烟率的有效手段。