Suppr超能文献

园艺疗法的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价

Effectiveness of horticultural therapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Kamioka Hiroharu, Tsutani Kiichiro, Yamada Minoru, Park Hyuntae, Okuizumi Hiroyasu, Honda Takuya, Okada Shinpei, Park Sang-Jun, Kitayuguchi Jun, Abe Takafumi, Handa Shuichi, Mutoh Yoshiteru

机构信息

Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-0072, Japan.

Department of Drug Policy and Management, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

出版信息

Complement Ther Med. 2014 Oct;22(5):930-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

Abstract

AIM

To summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of horticultural therapy (HT).

METHODS

Studies were eligible if they were RCTs. Studies included one treatment group in which HT was applied. We searched the following databases from 1990 up to August 20, 2013: MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Ichushi-Web, GHL, WPRIM, and PsyclNFO. We also searched all Cochrane Database and Campbell Systematic Reviews up to September 20, 2013.

RESULTS

Four studies met all inclusion criteria. The language of all eligible publications was English and Korean. Target diseases and/or symptoms were dementia, severe mental illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, frail elderly in nursing home, and hemiplegic patients after stroke. These studies showed significant effectiveness in one or more outcomes for mental health and behavior. However, our review especially detected omissions of the following descriptions: method used to generate randomization, concealment, blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. In addition, the results of this study suggested that the RCTs conducted have been of relatively low quality.

CONCLUSION

Although there was insufficient evidence in the studies of HT due to poor methodological and reporting quality and heterogeneity, HT may be an effective treatment for mental and behavioral disorders such as dementia, schizophrenia, depression, and terminal-care for cancer.

摘要

目的

总结随机对照试验(RCT)中关于园艺疗法(HT)效果的证据。

方法

符合条件的研究需为随机对照试验。研究包括一个应用园艺疗法的治疗组。我们检索了1990年至2013年8月20日的以下数据库:通过PubMed检索的MEDLINE、CINAHL、科学网、Ichushi-Web、GHL、WPRIM和PsyclNFO。我们还检索了截至2013年9月20日的所有Cochrane数据库和坎贝尔系统评价。

结果

四项研究符合所有纳入标准。所有符合条件的出版物语言为英语和韩语。目标疾病和/或症状为痴呆、精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症等严重精神疾病、养老院中的体弱老年人以及中风后的偏瘫患者。这些研究在心理健康和行为的一个或多个结局方面显示出显著效果。然而,我们的综述特别发现以下描述存在遗漏:用于产生随机化的方法、分配隐藏、盲法以及意向性分析。此外,本研究结果表明所开展的随机对照试验质量相对较低。

结论

尽管由于方法学和报告质量差以及异质性,园艺疗法研究中的证据不足,但园艺疗法可能是治疗痴呆、精神分裂症、抑郁症等精神和行为障碍以及癌症临终关怀的有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验