Häuser W, Bernardy K, Maier C
Innere Medizin I, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH, Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Deutschland,
Schmerz. 2015 Feb;29(1):96-108. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1452-0.
The efficacy and safety of long-term (≥ 6 months) opioid therapy (LtOT) in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is under debate. A systematic review with meta-analysis of the efficacy and harms of opioids in open-label extension studies of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has not been conducted until now.
We screened MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov (through to December 2013), as well as reference sections of systematic reviews of long-term RCTs of opioids in CNCP. We included open-label extension trials with a study duration ≥ 26 weeks of RCTs of ≥ 2 weeks duration. Using a random effects model, pooled estimates of event rates for categorical data and standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous variables were calculated.
We included 11 open-label extension studies with 2445 participants with nociceptive (low back, osteoarthritis) and neuropathic (radicular, polyneuropathy) pain. Median study duration was 26 (range 26-108) weeks. Four studies tested oxycodone, two studies tramadol and buprenorphine; hydromorphone, morphine, oxymorphone and tapentadol were each tested in one study. Of the patients randomized at baseline, 28.5 % (95 % confidence interval, CI, 17.9-39.2 %) finished the open-label period; 53.5 % (95 % CI 38.1-68.2 %) of patients entering the open-label period finished the open-label period. In sum, the total loss was 71.5 % (95 % CI 60.9-83.1 %) of all patients primarily included into the RCT. A total of 4.9 % (95 % CI 2.9-8.2 %) of patients dropped out due lack of efficacy; 16.8 % (95 % CI 11.0-24.8 %) dropped out to due adverse events (AE) in the open-label period and 0.08 % (95 % CI 0.001-0.05 %) of patients died during the open-label period. Only one study systematically assessed aberrant drug behavior of the patients: 5.7 % (95 % CI 3.4-9.6 %) showed aberrant drug behavior in the opinion of the investigators and 2.6 % (95 % CI 1.2-5.8 %) were judged to show aberrant drug behavior by independent expert assessment. There was no significant change (p = 0.50) in pain intensity between the end of the randomized period and the end of open-label phase (SMD 0.19 [- 0.03, 0.41]; six studies with 1360 participants).
Only a minority of patients selected for opioid therapy at randomization finished the long-term open-label study. However, sustained effects of pain reduction could be demonstrated in these patients. LtOT can be considered in carefully selected and monitored CNCP patients who experience clinically meaningful pain reduction with at least tolerable AE in short-term opioid therapy. The English full-text version of this article is freely available at SpringerLink (under "Supplementary Material").
长期(≥6个月)阿片类药物治疗(LtOT)用于慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)的疗效和安全性仍存在争议。迄今为止,尚未对随机对照试验(RCT)的开放标签扩展研究中阿片类药物的疗效和危害进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们检索了MEDLINE和clinicaltrials.gov(截至2013年12月),以及关于CNCP中阿片类药物长期RCT的系统评价的参考文献部分。我们纳入了持续时间≥2周的RCT的开放标签扩展试验,研究持续时间≥26周。使用随机效应模型,计算分类数据的事件发生率合并估计值和连续变量的标准化均数差(SMD)。
我们纳入了11项开放标签扩展研究,共2445名患有伤害性疼痛(腰背痛、骨关节炎)和神经性疼痛(神经根性疼痛、多发性神经病)的参与者。研究中位持续时间为26(范围26 - 108)周。四项研究测试了羟考酮,两项研究测试了曲马多和丁丙诺啡;氢吗啡酮、吗啡、羟吗啡酮和氨酚羟考酮各在一项研究中进行了测试。在基线随机分组的患者中,28.5%(95%置信区间,CI,17.9 - 39.2%)完成了开放标签期;进入开放标签期的患者中有53.5%(95% CI 38.1 - 68.2%)完成了开放标签期。总体而言,总失访率为最初纳入RCT的所有患者的71.5%(95% CI 60.9 - 83.1%)。共有4.9%(95% CI 2.9 - 8.2%)的患者因缺乏疗效而退出;16.8%(95% CI 11.0 - 24.8%)的患者在开放标签期因不良事件(AE)退出,0.08%(95% CI 0.001 - 0.05%)的患者在开放标签期死亡。只有一项研究系统评估了患者的异常药物行为:研究者认为5.7%(95% CI 3.4 - 9.6%)的患者表现出异常药物行为,独立专家评估判定2.6%(95% CI 1.2 - 5.8%)的患者表现出异常药物行为。随机期结束时与开放标签期结束时的疼痛强度无显著变化(p = 0.50)(SMD 0.19 [-0.03, 0.41];六项研究,1360名参与者)。
随机接受阿片类药物治疗的患者中只有少数完成了长期开放标签研究。然而,这些患者中可证明有持续的疼痛减轻效果。对于在短期阿片类药物治疗中经历有临床意义的疼痛减轻且不良事件至少可耐受的经过仔细挑选和监测的CNCP患者,可考虑LtOT。本文的英文全文可在SpringerLink上免费获取(在“补充材料”下)。