Suppr超能文献

评估德国2型糖尿病患者的自我管理:德文版糖尿病自我护理活动总结量表(SDSCA-G)的验证

Assessing self-management in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in Germany: validation of a German version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA-G).

作者信息

Kamradt Martina, Bozorgmehr Kayvan, Krisam Johannes, Freund Tobias, Kiel Marion, Qreini Markus, Flum Elisabeth, Berger Sarah, Besier Werner, Szecsenyi Joachim, Ose Dominik

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, Geb. 37, D-69115, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Medical Biometry; Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 18;12:185. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0185-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the most widely used self-reporting tools assessing diabetes self-management in English is the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) measure. To date there is no psychometric validated instrument in German to assess self-management in patients with diabetes mellitus. Therefore, this study aimed to translate the SDSCA into German and examine its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The English version of the SDSCA was translated into German following the guidelines for cultural adaptation. The German version of the SDSCA (SDSCA-G) was administered to a random sample of 315 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item characteristics were assessed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) were carried out to explore the construct validity. A multivariable linear regression model was used to identify the influence of predictor variables on the SDSCA-G sum score.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha for the SDSCA-G (all items) was α = 0.618 and an acceptable correlation between the SDSCA-G and Self-management Diabetes Mellitus-Questionnaire (SDQ) (ρ = 0.664) was identified. The EFA suggested a four factor construct as did the postulated model. The CFA showed the goodness of fit of the SDSCA-G. However, item 4 was found to be problematic regarding the analysis of psychometric properties. The omission of item 4 yielded an increase in Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.631) and improvements of the factor structure and model fit. No statistically significant influences of predictor variables on the SDSCA-G sum score were observed.

CONCLUSION

The revised German version of the SDSCA (SDSCA-G) is a reliable and valid tool assessing self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes in Germany.

摘要

背景

在英语中,评估糖尿病自我管理最广泛使用的自我报告工具之一是糖尿病自我护理活动总结(SDSCA)量表。迄今为止,尚无经过心理测量学验证的德语工具来评估糖尿病患者的自我管理。因此,本研究旨在将SDSCA翻译成德语并检验其心理测量学特性。

方法

按照文化适应指南将SDSCA的英语版本翻译成德语。将德语版SDSCA(SDSCA-G)应用于315例2型糖尿病患者的随机样本。使用克朗巴赫α系数分析信度,并评估项目特征。进行探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA和CFA)以探索结构效度。使用多变量线性回归模型确定预测变量对SDSCA-G总分的影响。

结果

SDSCA-G(所有项目)的克朗巴赫α系数为α = 0.618,并且确定SDSCA-G与糖尿病自我管理问卷(SDQ)之间存在可接受的相关性(ρ = 0.664)。EFA表明与假设模型一样存在四因素结构。CFA显示了SDSCA-G的拟合优度。然而,发现项目4在心理测量学特性分析方面存在问题。删除项目4后,克朗巴赫α系数增加(α = 0.631),因素结构和模型拟合得到改善。未观察到预测变量对SDSCA-G总分有统计学上的显著影响。

结论

修订后的德语版SDSCA(SDSCA-G)是评估德国2型糖尿病成年人自我管理的可靠且有效的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验