Suppr超能文献

失去的历史:物种灭绝如何从生命之树上剪除特征。

Losing history: how extinctions prune features from the tree of life.

作者信息

Davies T Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1 African Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140006. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0006.

Abstract

Biodiversity provides many valuable services to humanity; however, rapid expansion of the human population has placed increasing pressure on natural systems, and it has been suggested that we may be entering a sixth mass extinction. There is an urgent need, therefore, to prioritize conservation efforts if we are to maintain the provisioning of such service in the future. Phylogenetic diversity (PD), the summed branch lengths that connect species on the tree-of-life, might provide a valuable metric for conservation prioritization because it has been argued to capture feature diversity. Frequently, PD is estimated in millions of years, and therefore implicitly assumes an evolutionary model in which features diverge gradually over time. Here, I explore the expected loss of feature diversity when this assumption is violated. If evolution tends to slow down over time, as might be the case following adaptive radiations, losses of feature diversity might be relatively small. However, if evolution occurs in rapid bursts, following a punctuated model, impacts of extinctions might be much greater. PD captures many important properties, but if we use it as a proxy for feature diversity, we first need to ensure that we have the correct evolutionary model.

摘要

生物多样性为人类提供了许多有价值的服务;然而,人口的迅速增长给自然系统带来了越来越大的压力,有人认为我们可能正在进入第六次大灭绝。因此,如果我们要在未来维持此类服务的供应,迫切需要对保护工作进行优先排序。系统发育多样性(PD),即连接生命树上物种的分支长度总和,可能为保护优先排序提供一个有价值的指标,因为有人认为它能捕捉特征多样性。通常,PD是以百万年为单位估算的,因此隐含地假设了一种进化模型,即特征随时间逐渐分化。在这里,我探讨了违反这一假设时特征多样性的预期损失。如果进化随着时间的推移趋于减缓,就像适应性辐射之后可能出现的情况那样,特征多样性的损失可能相对较小。然而,如果进化以快速爆发的方式发生,遵循间断平衡模型,灭绝的影响可能会大得多。PD捕捉了许多重要属性,但如果我们将其用作特征多样性的代理,我们首先需要确保我们有正确的进化模型。

相似文献

1
Losing history: how extinctions prune features from the tree of life.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140006. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0006.
2
Predicting loss of evolutionary history: Where are we?
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):271-291. doi: 10.1111/brv.12228. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
Phylogenetic diversity, functional trait diversity and extinction: avoiding tipping points and worst-case losses.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140011. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0011.
4
Revisiting the impacts of non-random extinction on the tree-of-life.
Biol Lett. 2013 Jun 12;9(4):20130343. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0343. Print 2013 Aug 23.
6
Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably.
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 23;9(1):2888. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05126-3.
7
How global extinctions impact regional biodiversity in mammals.
Biol Lett. 2012 Apr 23;8(2):222-5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0752. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
8
Mammal diversity will take millions of years to recover from the current biodiversity crisis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):11262-11267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804906115. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Comparing strategies to preserve evolutionary diversity.
J Theor Biol. 2010 Sep 7;266(1):107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
10
Conserving Phylogenetic Diversity Can Be a Poor Strategy for Conserving Functional Diversity.
Syst Biol. 2017 Nov 1;66(6):1019-1027. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syx054.

引用本文的文献

1
The decline of mammal functional and evolutionary diversity worldwide.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 19;118(3). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921849118.
2
Integrating biogeography, threat and evolutionary data to explore extinction crisis in the taxonomic group of cycads.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 21;7(8):2735-2746. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2660. eCollection 2017 Apr.
3
Heterochrony as Diachronically Modified Cell-Cell Interactions.
Biology (Basel). 2016 Jan 14;5(1):4. doi: 10.3390/biology5010004.
4
Phylogeny, extinction and conservation: embracing uncertainties in a time of urgency.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 19;370(1662):20140002. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0002.

本文引用的文献

1
Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis: A Modeling Approach for Adaptive Evolution.
Am Nat. 2004 Dec;164(6):683-695. doi: 10.1086/426002.
2
Biodiversity, Stability, and Productivity in Competitive Communities.
Am Nat. 2000 Nov;156(5):534-552. doi: 10.1086/303402.
3
STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION.
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1341-1351. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01457.x.
6
Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Dec;28(12):689-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
7
Revisiting the impacts of non-random extinction on the tree-of-life.
Biol Lett. 2013 Jun 12;9(4):20130343. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0343. Print 2013 Aug 23.
8
The global diversity of birds in space and time.
Nature. 2012 Nov 15;491(7424):444-8. doi: 10.1038/nature11631. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
9
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.
Nature. 2012 Jun 6;486(7401):59-67. doi: 10.1038/nature11148.
10
On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change.
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 22;279(1735):2072-80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2367. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验