Giuditta Antonio
Department of Biology, Federico II University Naples, Italy.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Dec 16;8:219. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00219. eCollection 2014.
According to the sequential hypothesis (SH) memories acquired during wakefulness are processed during sleep in two serial steps respectively occurring during slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. During SWS memories to be retained are distinguished from irrelevant or competing traces that undergo downgrading or elimination. Processed memories are stored again during REM sleep which integrates them with preexisting memories. The hypothesis received support from a wealth of EEG, behavioral, and biochemical analyses of trained rats. Further evidence was provided by independent studies of human subjects. SH basic premises, data, and interpretations have been compared with corresponding viewpoints of the synaptic homeostatic hypothesis (SHY). Their similarities and differences are presented and discussed within the framework of sleep processing operations. SHY's emphasis on synaptic renormalization during SWS is acknowledged to underline a key sleep effect, but this cannot marginalize sleep's main role in selecting memories to be retained from downgrading traces, and in their integration with preexisting memories. In addition, SHY's synaptic renormalization raises an unsolved dilemma that clashes with the accepted memory storage mechanism exclusively based on modifications of synaptic strength. This difficulty may be bypassed by the assumption that SWS-processed memories are stored again by REM sleep in brain subnuclear quantum particles. Storing of memories in quantum particles may also occur in other vigilance states. Hints are provided on ways to subject the quantum hypothesis to experimental tests.
根据序列假说(SH),清醒时获得的记忆在睡眠期间分两个连续步骤进行处理,分别发生在慢波睡眠(SWS)和快速眼动(REM)睡眠期间。在慢波睡眠期间,要保留的记忆与经历降级或消除的无关或相互竞争的痕迹区分开来。经过处理的记忆在快速眼动睡眠期间再次存储,这将它们与先前存在的记忆整合在一起。该假说得到了对受过训练的大鼠进行的大量脑电图、行为学和生物化学分析的支持。对人类受试者的独立研究提供了进一步的证据。序列假说的基本前提、数据和解释已与突触稳态假说(SHY)的相应观点进行了比较。在睡眠处理操作的框架内呈现并讨论了它们的异同。突触稳态假说强调慢波睡眠期间的突触重整化,这被认为突出了睡眠的一个关键作用,但这不能忽视睡眠在从降级痕迹中选择要保留的记忆以及将它们与先前存在的记忆整合方面的主要作用。此外,突触稳态假说的突触重整化提出了一个未解决的困境,与仅基于突触强度修改的公认记忆存储机制相冲突。假设慢波睡眠处理过的记忆在快速眼动睡眠期间通过脑亚核量子粒子再次存储,可能会绕过这个困难。记忆在量子粒子中的存储也可能发生在其他警觉状态。文中给出了对量子假说进行实验测试的方法提示。