Suppr超能文献

单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)是否优于全膝关节置换术(TKA)?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) superior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Arirachakaran Alisara, Choowit Pathompong, Putananon Chinundorn, Muangsiri Samart, Kongtharvonskul Jatupon

机构信息

Orthopedics Department, Police General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand,

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25(5):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1610-9. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-regression to compare postoperative outcomes of pain VAS, knee function score, range of motion, complications and revision surgery rates between UKA and TKA were conducted. Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from MEDLINE and Scopus from inception to August 29, 2014.

RESULTS

Three of 1056 studies were eligible; two, three, two, three and three studies were included in pooling of pain visual analog score (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and Bristol Knee Score (BKS), maximum knee flexion, postoperative complications (aseptic loosening, progressive degenerative joint disease of lateral compartment, bearing dislocation, DVT, fractures and infection) and revision rates, respectively. The unstandardized mean difference (UMD) of the function scores (KSS, BS) for UKA was 1.62 (95 % CI -1.17, 4.42) better than TKA and for pain score was 0.1 (95 % CI -3.54, 3.73) higher than TKA, but both without statistical significance. UKA was more likely to show higher mean maximum knee flexion with a UMD of 1.88 (95 % CI -0.54, 4.30) when compared to TKA, but was also not statistically significant. UKA had a statistically significant lower chance of postoperative complications by 0.35 U (95 % CI 0.12, 0.98) when compared to TKA, but had higher revision rates than TKA with a value of 5.36 (95 % CI 1.06, 27.08).

CONCLUSION

In short-term outcomes (5 years or less, with follow-up of 0-5 years), TKA had higher postoperative complications than UKA, but had lower revision rates. There was only one study that reported long-term survivorship (more than 5 years, with follow-up of 5-15 years). Further research that assesses long-term survivorship is necessary to better evaluate UKA and TKA in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis.

摘要

目的

比较单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)与全膝关节置换术(TKA)的临床疗效。

方法

进行一项系统评价和meta回归分析,以比较UKA和TKA之间术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、膝关节功能评分、活动范围、并发症及翻修手术率等结果。从MEDLINE和Scopus数据库中检索自创建至2014年8月29日的相关随机对照试验。

结果

1056项研究中有3项符合条件;分别有2项、3项、2项、3项和3项研究纳入疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、膝关节协会评分(KSS)和布里斯托尔膝关节评分(BKS)、最大膝关节屈曲度、术后并发症(无菌性松动、外侧间室进行性退行性关节病、假体脱位、深静脉血栓形成、骨折和感染)及翻修率的汇总分析。UKA功能评分(KSS、BS)的未标准化平均差(UMD)比TKA高1.62(95%可信区间-1.17,4.42),疼痛评分比TKA高0.1(95%可信区间-3.54,3.73),但两者均无统计学意义。与TKA相比,UKA更有可能显示出更高的平均最大膝关节屈曲度,UMD为1.88(95%可信区间-0.54,4.30),但也无统计学意义。与TKA相比,UKA术后并发症发生几率显著降低0.35 U(95%可信区间0.12,0.98),但翻修率高于TKA,值为5.36(95%可信区间1.06,27.08)。

结论

在短期结果(5年或更短时间,随访0至5年)中,TKA术后并发症高于UKA,但翻修率较低。仅有一项研究报告了长期生存率(超过5年,随访5至15年)。有必要进行进一步评估长期生存率的研究,以更好地评价UKA和TKA在治疗单髁膝关节骨关节炎中的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验