AlGhatrif Majd, Lakatta Edward G
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science, NIA, NIH, Baltimore, MD, USA,
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Feb;17(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s11906-014-0523-z.
Isolated systolic hypertension is a major health burden that is expanding with the aging of our population. There is evidence that central arterial stiffness contributes to the rise in systolic blood pressure (SBP); at the same time, central arterial stiffening is accelerated in patients with increased SBP. This bidirectional relationship created a controversy in the field on whether arterial stiffness leads to hypertension or vice versa. Given the profound interdependency of arterial stiffness and blood pressure, this question seems intrinsically challenging, or probably naïve. The aorta's function of dampening the pulsatile flow generated by the left ventricle is optimal within a physiological range of distending pressure that secures the required distal flow, keeps the aorta in an optimal mechanical conformation, and minimizes cardiac work. This homeostasis is disturbed by age-associated, minute alterations in aortic hemodynamic and mechanical properties that induce short- and long-term alterations in each other. Hence, it is impossible to detect an "initial insult" at an epidemiological level. Earlier manifestations of these alterations are observed in young adulthood with a sharp decline in aortic strain and distensibility accompanied by an increase in diastolic blood pressure. Subsequently, aortic mechanical reserve is exhausted, and aortic remodeling with wall stiffening and dilatation ensue. These two phenomena affect pulse pressure in opposite directions and different magnitudes. With early remodeling, there is an increase in pulse pressure, due to the dominance of arterial wall stiffness, which in turn accelerates aortic wall stiffness and dilation. With advanced remodeling, which appears to be greater in men, the effect of diameter becomes more pronounced and partially offsets the effect of wall stiffness leading to plateauing in pulse pressure in men and slower increase in pulse pressure (PP) than that of wall stiffness in women. The complex nature of the hemodynamic changes with aging makes the "one-size-fits-all" approach suboptimal and urges for therapies that address the vascular profile that underlies a given blood pressure, rather than the blood pressure values themselves.
单纯收缩期高血压是一项重大的健康负担,且随着人口老龄化而加重。有证据表明,中心动脉僵硬度导致收缩压(SBP)升高;同时,SBP升高的患者中心动脉僵硬度加速增加。这种双向关系在该领域引发了关于动脉僵硬度是否导致高血压或反之亦然的争议。鉴于动脉僵硬度和血压之间存在深刻的相互依存关系,这个问题似乎本质上具有挑战性,或者可能很幼稚。主动脉对左心室产生的脉动血流的缓冲功能在确保所需远端血流、使主动脉保持最佳机械形态并使心脏做功最小化的生理扩张压力范围内是最佳的。这种稳态会因与年龄相关的主动脉血流动力学和机械特性的微小变化而受到干扰,这些变化会相互引起短期和长期改变。因此,在流行病学层面上不可能检测到“初始损伤”。这些改变的早期表现出现在年轻成年期,主动脉应变和扩张性急剧下降,同时舒张压升高。随后,主动脉机械储备耗尽,随之而来的是主动脉壁硬化和扩张的重塑。这两种现象对脉压的影响方向相反且程度不同。在早期重塑阶段,由于动脉壁僵硬度占主导,脉压会升高,这反过来又会加速主动脉壁僵硬度和扩张。在晚期重塑阶段,男性中这种情况似乎更明显,直径的影响变得更加显著,部分抵消了壁僵硬度的影响,导致男性脉压趋于平稳,且脉压(PP)的增加比女性壁僵硬度导致的增加更慢。随着年龄增长,血流动力学变化的复杂性使得“一刀切”的方法并非最优,这促使人们寻求针对特定血压背后血管特征的治疗方法,而不是血压值本身。