Sandberg Kathryn, Umans Jason G
*Center for the Study of Sex Differences in Health, Aging and Disease and Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, and Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Washington, DC, USA; and MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA
*Center for the Study of Sex Differences in Health, Aging and Disease and Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, and Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Washington, DC, USA; and MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
FASEB J. 2015 May;29(5):1646-52. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-269548. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced last May that steps will be taken to address the over-reliance on male cells and animals in preclinical research. To further address this announcement, in September 2014, scientists with varying perspectives came together at Georgetown University to discuss the following questions. (1) What metrics should the NIH use to assess tangible progress on policy changes designed to address the over-reliance on male cells and animals in preclinical research? (2) How effective can education be in reducing the over-reliance on male cells and animals in preclinical research and what educational initiatives sponsored by the NIH would most likely effect change? (3) What criteria should the NIH use to determine rigorously defined exceptions to the future proposal requirement of a balance of male and female cells and animals in preclinical studies? (4) What additional strategies in addition to proposal requirements should NIH use to reduce the overreliance of male cells and animals in preclinical research? The resulting consensus presented herein includes input from researchers not only from diverse disciplines of basic and translational science including biology, cell and molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, cardiology, endocrinology, nephrology, psychiatry, and obstetrics and gynecology, but also from recognized experts in publishing, industry, advocacy, science policy, clinical medicine, and population health. We offer our recommendations to aid the NIH as it selects, implements, monitors, and optimizes strategies to correct the over-reliance on male cells and animals in preclinical research.
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)去年5月宣布,将采取措施解决临床前研究中过度依赖雄性细胞和动物的问题。为了进一步落实这一宣布,2014年9月,来自不同领域的科学家齐聚乔治敦大学,讨论以下问题。(1)NIH应该使用哪些指标来评估旨在解决临床前研究中过度依赖雄性细胞和动物问题的政策变化的实际进展?(2)教育在减少临床前研究中对雄性细胞和动物的过度依赖方面能有多大效果,NIH赞助的哪些教育举措最有可能带来改变?(3)NIH应该使用哪些标准来严格界定未来临床前研究中雄性和雌性细胞及动物平衡的提案要求的例外情况?(4)除了提案要求之外,NIH还应该使用哪些额外策略来减少临床前研究中对雄性细胞和动物的过度依赖?本文给出的最终共识不仅包括来自基础科学和转化科学等不同学科(包括生物学、细胞与分子生物学、生物化学、生理学、药理学、神经科学、心脏病学、内分泌学、肾脏病学、精神病学以及妇产科学)的研究人员的意见,还包括来自出版、行业、宣传、科学政策、临床医学和人口健康领域的知名专家的意见。我们提供建议,以帮助NIH选择、实施、监测和优化相关策略,纠正临床前研究中对雄性细胞和动物的过度依赖。