Hudson Teresa J, Fortney John C, Pyne Jeffrey M, Lu Liya, Mittal Dinesh
The authors are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock (e-mail:
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Mar 1;66(3):272-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300570. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
Antidepressants are effective for treating depression, and collaborative care increases initiation of and adherence to antidepressants. Side effects of antidepressants are common and can adversely affect quality of life. Care managers address antidepressant side effects directly, but the impact of collaborative care on adverse effects is unknown. This secondary data analysis tested the hypothesis that patient-reported antidepressant side effects were lower for depressed patients receiving high-intensity, telemedicine-based collaborative care (TBCC) than for patients receiving low-intensity, practice-based collaborative care (PBCC).
This analysis used data from 190 patients enrolled in a pragmatic, multisite, comparative-effectiveness trial from 2007 to 2009 and followed for 18 months. Most patients were female (83%) and Caucasian (80%). The mean age was 50. Patients randomly assigned to PBCC received 12 months of evidence-based care from an on-site primary care provider and nurse care manager. Patients in TBCC received evidence-based care from an on-site primary care provider supported by a nurse care manager available off site by telephone, as well as by a telepharmacist, telepsychologist, and telepsychiatrist. Telephone interviews completed at baseline, six, 12, and 18 months included assessments of sociodemographic characteristics, beliefs about antidepressant treatment, depression severity, psychiatric comorbidity, medications, adherence, and side effects.
With controls for baseline case mix and time-variant medication characteristics, the TBCC group reported significantly fewer side effects at six and 12 months (p=.008 and .002, respectively). The number of antidepressants prescribed increased risk of side effects (p=.02).
Patients in the TBCC group reported fewer antidepressant-related side effects, which may have contributed to improved quality of life.
抗抑郁药对治疗抑郁症有效,协作式照护可增加抗抑郁药的起始使用及依从性。抗抑郁药的副作用很常见,会对生活质量产生不利影响。照护经理会直接处理抗抑郁药的副作用,但协作式照护对不良反应的影响尚不清楚。这项二次数据分析检验了以下假设:与接受低强度、基于实践的协作式照护(PBCC)的抑郁症患者相比,接受高强度、基于远程医疗的协作式照护(TBCC)的患者报告的抗抑郁药副作用更少。
本分析使用了2007年至2009年一项实用、多中心、比较效果试验中190名患者的数据,并对其进行了18个月的随访。大多数患者为女性(83%)和白种人(80%)。平均年龄为50岁。随机分配至PBCC组的患者接受了现场初级保健提供者和护士照护经理提供的12个月循证照护。TBCC组的患者接受了现场初级保健提供者提供的循证照护,该提供者得到了一名可通过电话远程提供服务的护士照护经理以及一名远程药剂师、远程心理学家和远程精神科医生的支持。在基线、6个月、12个月和18个月时完成的电话访谈包括对社会人口学特征、对抗抑郁治疗的信念、抑郁严重程度、精神共病、药物、依从性和副作用的评估。
在对基线病例组合和随时间变化的药物特征进行控制后,TBCC组在6个月和12个月时报告的副作用明显更少(分别为p = 0.008和0.002)。开具的抗抑郁药数量增加了副作用风险(p = 0.02)。
TBCC组的患者报告的抗抑郁药相关副作用较少,这可能有助于改善生活质量。