Comparative Evaluation of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution in Susceptibility testing of Amphotericin B, Voriconazole and Caspofungin against Clinical Aspergillus isolates.

BACKGROUND

Clinical importance of Aspergillus has increased over the past few decades because of rise in immunosuppressive drugs and immune-modulating diseases. Antifungal susceptibility of Aspergillus is rarely performed by clinical laboratories because of lack of easier method. This study has investigated and compared susceptibility pattern of Aspergillus isolates by disc diffusion, E-test and broth micro-dilution for amphotericin B, voriconazole and caspofungin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Disk diffusion (DD) method of antifungal susceptibility (AFS) was evaluated for three different classes of antifungals: amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VCZ) and caspofungin (CAS). Forty four clinical isolates of Aspergillus were selected; these included 34 A.fumigatus, 8 A.flavus and 2 A. terreus. AFS by DD and E-test was done on non-supplemented Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) and was compared to Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute(CLSI) broth micro-dilution (BMD) method of AFS.

RESULTS

Disk diffusion method for amphotericin B showed 87.5% agreement while E-test showed 93.8% agreement with broth micro-dilution. The agreement with broth micro-dilution was similar for both disk diffusion and E-test in case of voriconazole (93.8%) and caspofungin (100%). 31.8% and 9.1% Aspergillus isolates were found to have amphotericin B and voriconazole MIC values above epidemiological cut off value (ECV) respectively. All isolates were within ECV for caspofungin.

CONCLUSION

CLSI method of DD promises to be easier, reproducible and cost effective method of susceptibility testing, but this method must be interpreted with caution in case of amphotericin B susceptibility testing. E-test correlates better than DD with BMD.