Pearl Michael L, Dong Huan, Tulley Shaun, Zhao Qiang, Golightly Marc, Zucker Stanley, Chen Wen-Tien
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; Vitatex Inc., 25 Health Sciences Drive, Stony Brook, NY 11790, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
Contemporary management of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) uses biomarkers to monitor response to therapy. This study evaluates the role of invasive circulating tumor cells (iCTCs) in monitoring EOC treatment in comparison with serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125).
Molecular and microscopic analyses were used to identify seprase and CD44 as tumor progenitor (TP) markers. The iCTC flow cytometry assay was optimized using blood donated by 64 healthy donors, 49 patients with benign abdominal diseases and 123 EOC patients. Serial changes in iCTCs and CA125 were measured in 129 blood and 169 serum samples, respectively, from 31 EOC patients to assess their concordance during therapy and their relationship with risk of progressive disease (PD).
The assay had 97% specificity and 83% sensitivity for detecting iCTCs in blood of EOC patients. iCTCs were detected in each monitoring patient (31/31, 100%) and in 110 of the 129 blood samples (85.3%). The concordance between changes in iCTCs/CA125 levels and changes in the intervals associated with no evidence of disease (NED) were markedly stronger (specificity: CA125 93.8%; iCTCs 90.6%), whereas increases in iCTCs (79.5%) were more sensitive than increases in CA125 (67.6%) to predict PD or relapse. Among the six patients who had greater than 6 measurements, iCTCs but not CA125 antedated changes in clinical status from PD to NED during and after chemotherapy and predated relapse.
Serial measurements of iCTCs could predict therapeutic responsiveness in 31 EOC patients who underwent standard taxol/carboplatin therapy.
上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的当代管理利用生物标志物来监测治疗反应。本研究评估了侵袭性循环肿瘤细胞(iCTC)与血清癌抗原125(CA125)相比在监测EOC治疗中的作用。
采用分子和显微镜分析来鉴定分离酶和CD44作为肿瘤祖细胞(TP)标志物。使用64名健康供体、49名良性腹部疾病患者和123名EOC患者捐献的血液对iCTC流式细胞术检测进行了优化。分别在31名EOC患者的129份血液和169份血清样本中测量iCTC和CA125的系列变化,以评估它们在治疗期间的一致性以及与疾病进展(PD)风险的关系。
该检测对检测EOC患者血液中的iCTC具有97%的特异性和83%的敏感性。在每位接受监测的患者中(31/31,100%)以及129份血液样本中的110份(85.3%)检测到了iCTC。iCTC/CA125水平变化与无疾病证据(NED)间隔变化之间的一致性明显更强(特异性:CA125为93.8%;iCTC为90.6%),而iCTC的增加(79.5%)比CA125的增加(67.6%)在预测PD或复发方面更敏感。在进行了6次以上测量的6名患者中,iCTC而非CA125在化疗期间及化疗后临床状态从PD转变为NED之前以及复发之前就出现了变化。
对31名接受标准紫杉醇/卡铂治疗的EOC患者进行iCTC的系列测量可以预测治疗反应性。