Suppr超能文献

早期救援卵胞浆内单精子注射后的新生儿结局:5 年期间的分析。

Neonatal outcomes after early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an analysis of a 5-year period.

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1432-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.026. Epub 2015 Mar 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S): There were 13,232 ovarian stimulation cycles (IVF, n = 9,631; ICSI, n = 2,871; early rescue ICSI, n = 730) that resulted in the delivery of 5,001 babies (IVF, n = 3,670; ICSI, n = 1,095; early rescue ICSI, n = 246) from August 2008 to August 2013.

INTERVENTION(S): Early rescue ICSI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rates, neonatal outcomes, and congenital birth defects were analyzed.

RESULT(S): The early rescue ICSI cycles did not seem to have a negative effect on the clinical pregnancy rate (43.42%) when IVF cycles (45.33%) were compared with ICSI cycles (44.39%). In the early rescue ICSI group, a total of 254 clinical pregnancies were achieved: 197 (33.67%) live births, 38 (6.49%) miscarriages, 2 (0.79%) induced abortions, 3 (1.18%) fetal deaths, and 4 pregnancies (1.57%) without completion at follow-up. Overall, the multiple gestations, the delivery method, mean gestational age, preterm deliveries, mean birth weight, and rate of congenital birth defects of the early rescue ICSI group were similar to those in the conventional IVF and ICSI groups.

CONCLUSION(S): Early rescue ICSI had similar clinical pregnancy rates when compared with conventional IVF and ICSI, in addition to the delivery of healthy children. The clinical evidence from the early rescue ICSI group did not show an elevated rate of malformations. Early rescue ICSI seems to be a safe alternative method for individuals with total fertilization failure or near total fertilization failure when compared with conventional IVF treatment.

摘要

目的

评估早期补救卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的安全性和有效性。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

教学医院。

患者

2008 年 8 月至 2013 年 8 月期间,共有 13232 个卵巢刺激周期(IVF,n=9631;ICSI,n=2871;早期补救 ICSI,n=730)导致 5001 名婴儿分娩(IVF,n=3670;ICSI,n=1095;早期补救 ICSI,n=246)。

干预措施

早期补救 ICSI。

主要观察指标

临床妊娠率、新生儿结局和先天性出生缺陷。

结果

与 IVF 周期(45.33%)相比,ICSI 周期(44.39%)似乎并没有对早期补救 ICSI 周期的临床妊娠率产生负面影响。在早期补救 ICSI 组中,共获得 254 例临床妊娠:197 例(33.67%)活产,38 例(6.49%)流产,2 例(0.79%)人工流产,3 例(1.18%)胎儿死亡,4 例(1.57%)妊娠未完成。总体而言,早期补救 ICSI 组的多胎妊娠、分娩方式、平均孕龄、早产、平均出生体重和先天性出生缺陷率与常规 IVF 和 ICSI 组相似。

结论

与常规 IVF 和 ICSI 相比,早期补救 ICSI 具有相似的临床妊娠率,同时也能分娩健康的婴儿。早期补救 ICSI 组的临床证据并未显示畸形率升高。与常规 IVF 治疗相比,早期补救 ICSI 似乎是总受精失败或接近总受精失败患者的一种安全替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验