Cuche Matthieu, Beckerman Rachel, Chowdhury Cyrus A, van Weelden Marije A
Covidien;
CBPartners;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Dec;30(6):571-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000713.
Evidence requirements may differ across HTA bodies, and so pharmaceutical companies must plan to synergize their evidence generation strategy, across global regulatory and HTA bodies. Until recently, companies had no official platform to discuss the clinical development of a drug with HTA bodies; however, this is changing.
To achieve broad usage in the EU, products must achieve both regulatory and reimbursement approval, the latter of which is based on HTA appraisal in many markets. The objective of this study is to present and evaluate the different options available for early HTA consultation (during drug development/Phase III) in the major European markets from the industry perspective.
An exploratory (nonsystematic) literature review was performed to identify the European markets offering early HTA consultations, and each process was analyzed using a set of predefined metrics that are relevant to industry (the ability to consult with the regulatory body in parallel, consultation fees, length of consultation meeting, language of consultation meeting, maximum number of pharmaceutical company employees attending, procedural timelines, nature of data for which consultative advice can be sought, the output of the process, and the ability to involve external experts).
Four different types of early HTA consultation processes were identified across the major European HTA markets. The nature of these processes varied in terms of the types and number of questions that can be addressed, the length of the meeting, the reporting output, and the ability to involve external experts.
The availability of various options for early HTA consultation may help to avoid a mismatch between the evidence generated by means of a product's clinical development program, and the evidence expected by HTA bodies and payers, which can facilitate the pricing and reimbursement process upon a product's market authorization.
不同卫生技术评估机构的证据要求可能有所不同,因此制药公司必须规划其证据生成策略,以协同应对全球监管机构和卫生技术评估机构。直到最近,公司还没有与卫生技术评估机构讨论药物临床开发的官方平台;然而,这种情况正在改变。
要在欧盟广泛使用,产品必须获得监管批准和报销批准,在许多市场中,后者基于卫生技术评估。本研究的目的是从行业角度介绍和评估欧洲主要市场早期卫生技术评估咨询(在药物开发/III期期间)的不同选择。
进行了一项探索性(非系统性)文献综述,以确定提供早期卫生技术评估咨询的欧洲市场,并使用一组与行业相关的预定义指标分析每个流程(与监管机构并行咨询的能力、咨询费用、咨询会议时长、咨询会议语言、制药公司参会员工的最大数量、程序时间表、可寻求咨询建议的数据性质、流程产出以及邀请外部专家的能力)。
在欧洲主要卫生技术评估市场中确定了四种不同类型的早期卫生技术评估咨询流程。这些流程的性质在可解决的问题类型和数量、会议时长、报告产出以及邀请外部专家的能力方面各不相同。
早期卫生技术评估咨询的多种选择的存在可能有助于避免产品临床开发计划所产生的证据与卫生技术评估机构和支付方预期的证据之间的不匹配,这可以促进产品市场授权后的定价和报销流程。