West Nicholas, Ansermino J Mark, Carr Roxane R, Leung Karen, Zhou Guohai, Lauder Gillian R
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada,
Can J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;62(8):891-900. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0380-5. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
Morphine administered by continuous opioid infusion (COI) or by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is associated with opioid-induced pruritus (OIP). Intravenous naloxone administered separately to the morphine infusion at a dose of 0.25-1.65 μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1) can provide effective prevention from OIP. Nevertheless, this strategy requires a dedicated intravenous line and an additional infusion pump. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an admixture of naloxone with morphine in normal saline administered via COI or PCA would also prevent OIP in children without attenuation of analgesia or increased opioid utilization.
In this randomized controlled trial, children meeting the inclusion criteria (aged 8-18 yr, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, normal developmental profile and prescribed COI/PCA morphine for postoperative analgesia) were randomized to receive an infusion containing a naloxone, opioid, and saline admixture (NOSA) of 12 μg naloxone per 1 mg morphine per 1 mL normal saline or morphine only (control). The severity of opioid-induced pruritus was assessed by self-report using a modified colour analogue scale (mCAS; score 0-10). The groups were also compared for opioid utilization, pain scores, and administration of antipruritic medications, which were recorded for up to 48 hr or until the COI/PCA was discontinued.
Ninety-two participants were enrolled in the study. The median [interquartile range] dose of naloxone administered to the NOSA participants was 0.37 [0.30-0.48] μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1). The incidence of OIP, determined by self-report and treatment, was not different between groups: 22% in the NOSA group vs 36% in the control group (mean difference, -15%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -33 to 4; P = 0.164). The severity of opioid-induced pruritus was similar in the two groups, with a median difference in the participants' mean mCAS score of -0.29 (95% CI, -0.75 to 0.26; P = 0.509). Opioid utilization did not differ between groups, with a median difference of -1.35 μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1) (95% CI, -5.85 to 7.55; P = 0.518), and pain scores did not differ, with a median difference of 0.0 (95% CI, -1.0 to 1.5; P = 0.659).
This admixture of naloxone and morphine in normal saline did not decrease the incidence or severity of OIP in this sample. Separate administration of naloxone may be the more effective strategy for prevention of OIP. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01071057).
持续阿片类药物输注(COI)或患者自控镇痛(PCA)给予吗啡会导致阿片类药物引起的瘙痒(OIP)。以0.25 - 1.65μg·kg⁻¹·hr⁻¹的剂量将静脉注射纳洛酮单独加入吗啡输注中可有效预防OIP。然而,该策略需要一条专用静脉通路和一台额外的输液泵。本研究的目的是确定通过COI或PCA在生理盐水中将纳洛酮与吗啡混合给药是否也能预防儿童的OIP,同时不减弱镇痛效果或增加阿片类药物的用量。
在这项随机对照试验中,符合纳入标准的儿童(年龄8 - 18岁,美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级I - III级,发育正常且术后镇痛处方使用COI/PCA吗啡)被随机分为两组,分别接受每1mL生理盐水中含12μg纳洛酮、阿片类药物和生理盐水的混合液(NOSA)或仅接受吗啡(对照组)。采用改良的颜色模拟量表(mCAS;评分0 - 10)通过自我报告评估阿片类药物引起的瘙痒严重程度。还比较了两组的阿片类药物用量、疼痛评分以及止痒药物的使用情况,记录时间长达48小时或直至COI/PCA停止。
92名参与者纳入本研究。给予NOSA组参与者的纳洛酮中位[四分位间距]剂量为0.37[0.30 - 0.48]μg·kg⁻¹·hr⁻¹。通过自我报告和治疗确定的OIP发生率在两组间无差异:NOSA组为22%,对照组为36%(平均差异为 - 15%;95%置信区间[CI]为 - 33至4;P = 0.164)。两组阿片类药物引起的瘙痒严重程度相似,参与者的平均mCAS评分中位数差异为 - 0.29(95%CI为 - 0.75至0.26;P = 0.509)。两组间阿片类药物用量无差异,中位数差异为 - 1.35μg·kg⁻¹·hr⁻¹(95%CI为 - 5.85至7.55;P = 0.518),疼痛评分也无差异,中位数差异为0.0(95%CI为 - 1.0至1.5;P = 0.659)。
在生理盐水中将纳洛酮与吗啡混合并未降低本样本中OIP的发生率或严重程度。单独给予纳洛酮可能是预防OIP更有效的策略。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT01071057)。