Rodrigo Dienstmann, Sage Bionetworks, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Rodrigo Dienstmann and Josep Tabernero, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; and Ramon Salazar, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 1;33(16):1787-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.0213. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
For more than three decades, postoperative chemotherapy-initially fluoropyrimidines and more recently combinations with oxaliplatin-has reduced the risk of tumor recurrence and improved survival for patients with resected colon cancer. Although universally recommended for patients with stage III disease, there is no consensus about the survival benefit of postoperative chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer. The most recent adjuvant clinical trials have not shown any value for adding targeted agents, namely bevacizumab and cetuximab, to standard chemotherapies in stage III disease, despite improved outcomes in the metastatic setting. However, biomarker analyses of multiple studies strongly support the feasibility of refining risk stratification in colon cancer by factoring in molecular characteristics with pathologic tumor staging. In stage II disease, for example, microsatellite instability supports observation after surgery. Furthermore, the value of BRAF or KRAS mutations as additional risk factors in stage III disease is greater when microsatellite status and tumor location are taken into account. Validated predictive markers of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit for stage II or III colon cancer are lacking, but intensive research is ongoing. Recent advances in understanding the biologic hallmarks and drivers of early-stage disease as well as the micrometastatic environment are expected to translate into therapeutic strategies tailored to select patients. This review focuses on the pathologic, molecular, and gene expression characterizations of early-stage colon cancer; new insights into prognostication; and emerging predictive biomarkers that could ultimately help define the optimal adjuvant treatments for patients in routine clinical practice.
三十多年来,术后化疗——最初是氟嘧啶类药物,最近是与奥沙利铂联合应用——降低了结肠癌患者的肿瘤复发风险,并提高了生存率。虽然术后化疗普遍适用于 III 期疾病患者,但对于 II 期结肠癌患者,术后化疗是否具有生存获益尚无共识。最近的辅助临床试验表明,在 III 期疾病中添加贝伐珠单抗和西妥昔单抗等靶向药物并不能使标准化疗获益,尽管转移性疾病的结局有所改善。然而,多项研究的生物标志物分析强烈支持通过将分子特征与病理肿瘤分期相结合,对结肠癌进行风险分层的可行性。例如,在 II 期疾病中,微卫星不稳定性支持术后观察。此外,当考虑微卫星状态和肿瘤位置时,BRAF 或 KRAS 突变作为 III 期疾病的附加危险因素的价值更大。对于 II 期或 III 期结肠癌,缺乏辅助化疗获益的有效预测标志物,但正在进行密集的研究。对早期疾病的生物学特征和驱动因素以及微转移环境的理解的最新进展有望转化为针对特定患者的治疗策略。这篇综述重点关注早期结肠癌的病理、分子和基因表达特征;预后预测的新见解;以及新兴的预测生物标志物,这些标志物最终可能有助于确定常规临床实践中患者的最佳辅助治疗方案。