van Tilburg Miranda A L, Claar Robyn L, Romano Joan M, Langer Shelby L, Walker Lynn S, Whitehead William E, Abdullah Bisher, Christie Dennis L, Levy Rona L
*Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC †School of Social Work ‡Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA §Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN ||Prime Health Clinic, Puyallup ¶Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle WA.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Oct;61(4):431-6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000841.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and abdominal pain of functional origin (AP) are common gastrointestinal disorders in children, which are associated with increased risk for depression and disability. Both symptom severity and coping with symptoms may contribute to these outcomes. We hypothesized that children with AP use different coping strategies compared with those with IBD for a number of reasons, including the fact that fewer treatment options are available to them. We also examined whether coping was related to depression and functional disability beyond the contributions of symptom severity.
The study method included secondary data analysis of 2 existing data sets including 200 children with AP (73% girls, mean age 11.2 years) and 189 children with IBD (49% girls, mean age 13.8 years).
Compared with patients with IBD, patients with AP reported more use of coping strategies of self-isolation, behavioral disengagement, and catastrophizing, as well as problem solving and seeking social support. Multivariate analyses revealed that, in both samples, ≥1 coping strategies were associated with depression and functional disability, independent of symptom severity, and controlling for age and sex. In IBD, symptoms were not a significant predictor of depression but coping was. Catastrophizing predicted depression and disability in both samples.
Patients with AP report more frequent use of several of the coping strategies we measured compared with patients with IBD. Certain types of coping, particularly catastrophizing, were associated with greater depression and functional disability in both groups. Clinicians should be aware of maladaptive coping, which may be a risk factor for poor psychosocial and functional outcomes in both patient groups.
炎症性肠病(IBD)和功能性腹痛(AP)是儿童常见的胃肠道疾病,与抑郁和残疾风险增加相关。症状严重程度和应对症状的方式都可能导致这些结果。我们假设,由于多种原因,包括可用于AP患儿的治疗选择较少,AP患儿与IBD患儿使用不同的应对策略。我们还研究了除症状严重程度的影响外,应对方式是否与抑郁和功能残疾相关。
研究方法包括对2个现有数据集进行二次数据分析,其中一个数据集包含200名AP患儿(73%为女孩,平均年龄11.2岁),另一个包含189名IBD患儿(49%为女孩,平均年龄13.8岁)。
与IBD患儿相比,AP患儿报告更多地使用自我孤立、行为脱离和灾难化等应对策略,以及解决问题和寻求社会支持。多变量分析显示,在两个样本中,≥1种应对策略与抑郁和功能残疾相关,独立于症状严重程度,并对年龄和性别进行了控制。在IBD中,症状不是抑郁的显著预测因素,但应对方式是。灾难化在两个样本中均预测了抑郁和残疾。
与IBD患儿相比,AP患儿报告更频繁地使用我们测量的几种应对策略。某些类型的应对方式,特别是灾难化,在两组中均与更严重的抑郁和功能残疾相关。临床医生应意识到适应不良的应对方式,这可能是两组患者心理社会和功能不良结局的一个危险因素。