Suppr超能文献

全球不同地区2型糖尿病患者强化血糖控制与标准血糖控制的效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Sardar Partha, Udell Jacob A, Chatterjee Saurav, Bansilal Sameer, Mukherjee Debabrata, Farkouh Michael E

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (P.S.).

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (J.A.U.) Peter Munk Centre of Excellence in Multinational Clinical Trials, University Health Network, Heart & Stroke Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (J.A.U., M.E.F.).

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 May 5;4(5):e001577. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001577.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regional variation in type 2 diabetes mellitus care may affect outcomes in patients treated with intensive versus standard blood glucose control. We sought to evaluate these differences between North America and the rest of the world.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Databases were searched from their inception through December 2013. Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of intensive therapy with standard therapy for macro- and microvascular complications in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus were selected. We calculated summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with the random-effects model. The analysis included 34 967 patients from 17 randomized controlled trials (7 in North America and 10 in the rest of the world). There were no significant differences between intensive and standard therapy groups for all-cause mortality (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.32). For trials conducted in North America, intensive therapy compared with standard glycemic control resulted in significantly higher all-cause mortality (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.40) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.90) than trials conducted in the rest of the world (all-cause mortality OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03; interaction P=0.006; cardiovascular mortality OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.00; interaction P=0.007). Analysis of individual macro- and microvascular outcomes revealed no significant regional differences; however, the risk of severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher in trials of intensive therapy in North America (OR 3.52, 95% CI 3.07 to 4.03) compared with the rest of the world (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.47; interaction P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Randomization to intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients was associated with increases in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and severe hypoglycemia in North America compared with the rest of the world. Further investigation into the pathobiology or patient variability underlying these findings is warranted.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病治疗的地区差异可能会影响接受强化血糖控制与标准血糖控制的患者的治疗结局。我们试图评估北美与世界其他地区之间的这些差异。

方法与结果

检索数据库自建库至2013年12月的数据。选择比较强化治疗与标准治疗对2型糖尿病成年患者大血管和微血管并发症影响的随机对照试验。我们采用随机效应模型计算汇总比值比(OR)和95%可信区间(CI)。该分析纳入了来自17项随机对照试验的34967例患者(7项在北美,10项在世界其他地区)。强化治疗组与标准治疗组在全因死亡率(OR 1.03,95%CI 0.93至1.13)和心血管死亡率(OR 1.09,95%CI 0.90至1.32)方面无显著差异。在北美进行的试验中,与标准血糖控制相比,强化治疗导致的全因死亡率(OR 1.21,95%CI 1.05至1.40)和心血管死亡率(OR 1.41,95%CI 1.05至1.90)显著高于在世界其他地区进行的试验(全因死亡率OR 0.93,95%CI 0.85至1.03;交互作用P=0.006;心血管死亡率OR 0.89,95%CI 0.79至1.00;交互作用P=0.007)。对个体大血管和微血管结局的分析未发现显著的地区差异;然而,与世界其他地区相比,北美强化治疗试验中严重低血糖的风险显著更高(OR 3.52,95%CI 3.07至4.03)(OR 1.45,95%CI 0.85至2.47;交互作用P=0.001)。

结论

与世界其他地区相比,北美2型糖尿病患者随机接受强化血糖控制与全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和严重低血糖的增加相关。有必要进一步研究这些发现背后的病理生物学或患者变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdca/4599400/620dc32d1a1a/jah30004-e001577-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验