Munn Zachary, Lockwood Craig, Moola Sandeep
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Jun;12(3):131-8. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12094. Epub 2015 May 20.
A systematic review of evidence is the research method which underpins the traditional approach to evidence-based health care. As systematic reviews follow a rigorous methodology, they can take a substantial amount of time to complete ranging in duration from 6 months to 2 years. Rapid reviews have been proposed as a method to provide summaries of the literature in a more timely fashion.
The aim of this paper is to outline our experience of developing evidence summaries in the context of a point of care resource as a contribution to the emerging field of rapid review methodologies.
Evidence summaries are defined as a synopsis that summarizes existing international evidence on healthcare interventions or activities. These summaries are based on structured searches of the literature and selected evidence-based healthcare databases. Following the search, all studies are assessed for internal validity using an abridged set of critical appraisal tools. Once developed, they undergo three levels of peer review by internal and external experts.
As of November 2014, there are 2458 evidence summaries that have been created across a range of conditions to inform evidence-based healthcare practices. In addition, there is ongoing development of various new evidence summaries on a wide range of topics. Approximately 60-70 new evidence summaries are published every month, covering research in various medical specialty areas. All summaries are updated annually.
Systematic reviews, although the ideal type of research to inform practice, often do not meet the needs of users at the point of care. This article describes the development framework for the creation of evidence summaries, a type of rapid review. Although evidence summaries may result in a less rigorous process of development, they can be useful for improving practice at the point of care.
对证据进行系统评价是支撑传统循证医疗保健方法的研究方法。由于系统评价遵循严格的方法学,可能需要大量时间才能完成,持续时间从6个月到2年不等。快速评价被提议作为一种能更及时地提供文献综述的方法。
本文旨在概述我们在即时医疗资源背景下制定证据综述的经验,为快速评价方法这一新兴领域做出贡献。
证据综述被定义为对医疗保健干预措施或活动的现有国际证据进行总结的概要。这些综述基于对文献和选定的循证医疗保健数据库的结构化检索。检索之后,使用一套简化的关键评价工具对所有研究进行内部有效性评估。一旦完成,它们要经过内部和外部专家的三级同行评审。
截至2014年11月,已经针对一系列病症创建了2458份证据综述,以指导循证医疗保健实践。此外,正在针对广泛的主题不断开发各种新的证据综述。每月大约发表60 - 70份新的证据综述,涵盖各个医学专业领域的研究。所有综述每年更新一次。
系统评价虽然是为实践提供依据的理想研究类型,但往往不能满足即时医疗使用者的需求。本文描述了创建证据综述(一种快速评价类型)的开发框架。虽然证据综述的开发过程可能不够严格,但它们有助于改善即时医疗中的实践。