Wainberg Zev A, Drakaki Alexandra
UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Hematology/Oncology , 8-684 Factor Building, Box 951781, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1781 , USA
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15(8):1205-20. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1050375. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
Use of both the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab as potential first-line therapies for patients with RAS-wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer presents clinicians with an important decision. We review clinical data evaluating first-line treatment with EGFR inhibitors. Additionally, by undertaking an integrated 'bench-to-bedside' approach, we provide potential models, testable hypotheses and biological rationales that might account for these clinical observations.
A literature search encompassing PubMed and the ASCO/ESMO websites was undertaken in October 2014. Search terms included 'colorectal cancer', 'cetuximab', 'panitumumab' and 'bevacizumab'.
A number of clinical studies indicate a survival benefit for patients receiving EGFR inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting, relative to both chemotherapy alone and VEGF inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Existing preclinical and clinical data suggest that a biological basis exists for providing RAS-wild-type patients with first-line EGFR inhibitors, followed by second-line VEGF inhibitors. More specifically, first-line treatment with EGFR inhibitors may elicit unique biological changes that sensitize tumors to subsequent lines of therapy; conversely, first-line treatment with VEGF inhibitors may elicit biological changes that desensitize tumors to subsequent lines of therapy.
血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂贝伐单抗以及表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗,作为RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者潜在的一线治疗药物,给临床医生带来了一个重要的决策问题。我们回顾了评估EGFR抑制剂一线治疗的临床数据。此外,通过采用一种综合的“从实验台到病床旁”的方法,我们提供了可能解释这些临床观察结果的潜在模型、可检验的假设和生物学原理。
2014年10月进行了一项文献检索,范围包括PubMed以及美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)/欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)网站。检索词包括“结直肠癌”、“西妥昔单抗”、“帕尼单抗”和“贝伐单抗”。
多项临床研究表明,在一线治疗中,接受EGFR抑制剂联合化疗的患者相对于单纯化疗以及VEGF抑制剂加化疗的患者有生存获益。现有的临床前和临床数据表明,为RAS野生型患者提供一线EGFR抑制剂,随后使用二线VEGF抑制剂存在生物学基础。更具体地说,EGFR抑制剂一线治疗可能引发独特的生物学变化,使肿瘤对后续治疗敏感;相反,VEGF抑制剂一线治疗可能引发生物学变化,使肿瘤对后续治疗不敏感。