Ritchie Carrie, Kenardy Justin, Smeets Rob, Sterling Michele
Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Centre for National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation Medicine (CONROD), NHMRC CRE in Recovery Following Road Traffic Injury, Griffith University, Gold Coast.
CONROD, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):157. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
Whiplash associated disorders are the most common non-hospitalised injuries following a road traffic crash. Up to 50% of individuals who experience a whiplash injury will not fully recover and report ongoing pain and disability. Most recovery, if it occurs, takes place in the first 2-3 months post injury, indicating that treatment provided in the early stages is critical to long-term outcome. However, early management approaches for people with acute whiplash associated disorders are modestly effective. One reason may be that the treatments have been non-specific and have not targeted the processes shown to be associated with poor recovery, such as post-traumatic stress symptoms. Targeting and modulating these early stress responses in the early management of acute whiplash associated disorders may improve health outcomes. Early aggressive psychological interventions in the form of psychological debriefing may be detrimental to recovery and are now not recommended for management of early post-traumatic stress symptoms. In contrast, Stress Inoculation Training (SIT) is a cognitive behavioural approach that teaches various general problem-solving and coping strategies to manage stress-related anxiety (ie, relaxation training, cognitive restructuring and positive self-statements) and provides important information to injured individuals about the impact of stress on their physical and psychological wellbeing. While referral to a psychologist may be necessary in some cases where acute stress disorder or other more significant psychological reactions to stress are evident, in the case of acute whiplash injuries, it is neither feasible nor necessary for a psychologist to deliver the early stress modulation intervention to all injured individuals. The feasibility of using other specially trained health professionals to deliver psychological interventions has been explored in conditions such as chronic low back pain, chronic whiplash and cancer, but few trials have studied this approach in acute musculoskeletal conditions with the aim of preventing the development of chronic pain. As physiotherapy is the most common intervention received by individuals with a whiplash injury, physiotherapists are ideally placed to provide SIT in conjunction with standard physical rehabilitation. This study (StressModEx) will target individuals in the acute stage of injury and address the stress responses associated with the accident or injury (event-related distress) with the aim of improving both physical and mental health outcomes.
Is SIT integrated with standard physiotherapy exercise and delivered by physiotherapists more effective than physiotherapy exercise alone in reducing neck pain and disability in individuals with acute whiplash associated disorders?
Parallel randomised controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment.
100 individuals with grade II or III (no fracture/dislocation or neurological loss) acute whiplash associated disorder<4 weeks duration and at least moderate neck pain-related disability and hyper-arousal symptoms will be recruited for the study. Participants will be assessed via online surveys or in-person at a university research laboratory. Interventions will be provided at community physiotherapy practices in Brisbane, Gold Coast, Toowoomba and Mackay, Queensland, Australia.
Clinical-guideline-recommended supervised physiotherapy exercise sessions (10 sessions) integrated with six (once per week) SIT sessions.
Clinical-guideline-recommended supervised physiotherapy exercise sessions (10) only.
Primary (Neck Disability Index) and secondary (Acute Stress Disorder Scale; Post-traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale; Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale; Pain Catastrophisingo Scale; Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire; Coping Strategies Questionnaire; Global impression of recovery; pain intensity; SF36) outcomes will be measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after randomisation.
Data analysis will be blinded and by intention to treat. Outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed and logistic regression models that will include baseline scores as covariates, participants as random effects and treatment conditions as fixed factors.
This study will be the first to address early stress responses following acute whiplash injury through a novel intervention that integrates SIT and physiotherapy exercise.
挥鞭样损伤相关疾病是道路交通事故后最常见的非住院损伤。高达50%的挥鞭样损伤患者无法完全康复,并报告持续疼痛和残疾。大多数恢复情况(如果发生的话)发生在受伤后的前2 - 3个月,这表明早期提供的治疗对长期预后至关重要。然而,急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者的早期管理方法效果一般。一个原因可能是治疗方法缺乏针对性,没有针对那些显示与恢复不佳相关的过程,如创伤后应激症状。在急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病的早期管理中,针对并调节这些早期应激反应可能会改善健康结局。早期以心理疏导形式进行的积极心理干预可能对恢复有害,现在不建议用于管理创伤后早期应激症状。相比之下,应激接种训练(SIT)是一种认知行为方法,教授各种一般的问题解决和应对策略来管理与压力相关的焦虑(即放松训练、认知重构和积极的自我陈述),并向受伤个体提供关于压力对其身心健康影响的重要信息。虽然在某些急性应激障碍或其他更明显的压力心理反应的情况下,可能需要转介给心理学家,但对于急性挥鞭样损伤,让心理学家对所有受伤个体进行早期应激调节干预既不可行也没有必要。在慢性腰痛、慢性挥鞭样损伤和癌症等情况下,已经探讨了使用其他经过专门培训的健康专业人员提供心理干预的可行性,但很少有试验以预防慢性疼痛发展为目的,在急性肌肉骨骼疾病中研究这种方法。由于物理治疗是挥鞭样损伤患者最常接受的干预措施,物理治疗师非常适合在提供标准物理康复的同时提供SIT。本研究(StressModEx)将针对损伤急性期的个体,解决与事故或损伤相关的应激反应(事件相关困扰),以改善身心健康结局。
由物理治疗师将SIT与标准物理治疗运动相结合进行干预,在减轻急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者的颈部疼痛和残疾方面,是否比单独的物理治疗运动更有效?
采用盲法结局评估的平行随机对照试验。
将招募100名患有II级或III级(无骨折/脱位或神经功能丧失)、病程<4周且至少有中度颈部疼痛相关残疾和过度唤醒症状的急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者参与本研究。参与者将通过在线调查或在大学研究实验室进行面对面评估。干预将在澳大利亚昆士兰州布里斯班、黄金海岸、图文巴和麦凯的社区物理治疗诊所提供。
按照临床指南推荐进行的有监督的物理治疗运动课程(10节),并结合六节(每周一次)SIT课程。
仅按照临床指南推荐进行的有监督的物理治疗运动课程(10节)。
主要结局(颈部残疾指数)和次要结局(急性应激障碍量表;创伤后应激诊断量表;抑郁、焦虑和压力量表;疼痛灾难化量表;疼痛自我效能问卷;应对策略问卷;总体恢复印象;疼痛强度;SF36)将在随机分组后的基线、6周、6个月和12个月进行测量。
数据分析将采用盲法并按意向性分析。结局将使用线性混合和逻辑回归模型进行分析,模型将包括基线分数作为协变量;参与者作为随机效应;治疗条件作为固定因素。
本研究将是首个通过整合SIT和物理治疗运动的新型干预措施来解决急性挥鞭样损伤后早期应激反应的研究。