Suppr超能文献

血脂异常与糖尿病性黄斑水肿:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Dyslipidemia and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Center for Experimental Medicine, Institute of Clinical Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland.

Center for Experimental Medicine, Institute of Clinical Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Ireland.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2015 Sep;122(9):1820-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

Abstract

TOPIC

A systematic review and meta-analysis of dyslipidemia and diabetic macular edema (DME).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Diabetic macular edema causes impairment of vision in patients with diabetes, and dyslipidemia has been reported as a risk factor for its development. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was undertaken to examine the evidence of an association between dyslipidemia and DME.

METHODS

We defined eligibility criteria as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies reporting on the relationship between blood lipid levels and DME. We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from inception to September 2014. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the quality of case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 4959 publications. After screening, we selected 21 articles for review (5 cross-sectional, 5 cohort, 7 case-control, and 4 RCTs). Meta-analysis of case-control studies revealed that mean levels of total serum cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), and serum triglycerides (TGs) were significantly higher in patients with DME compared with those without DME (TC: 30.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.14-39.02; P < 0.001; LDL: 18.62; 95% CI, 5.80-31.43; P < 0.05; TG: 24.82; 95% CI, 9.21-40.42; P < 0.05). Meta-analysis of RCTs did not show significant risk in worsening of hard exudates and severity of DME in the lipid-lowering group compared with placebo (hard exudates: relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.47-2.11; P = 1.00; DME: relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.75-1.86; P = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite evidence from the cohort studies and meta-analysis of the case-control studies suggesting a strong relationship between lipid levels and DME, this was not confirmed by the meta-analysis that included only prospective RCTs. Therefore, given the significant public health relevance of the topic, the relationship between lipid levels and DME deserves further investigation.

摘要

标题

血脂异常与糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的系统评价和荟萃分析。

临床相关性

糖尿病性黄斑水肿可导致糖尿病患者视力受损,血脂异常已被报道为其发生的一个危险因素。进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以检查血脂异常与 DME 之间的关联的证据。

方法

我们将纳入标准定义为随机对照试验(RCT)以及队列、病例对照和横断面研究,报告血脂水平与 DME 之间的关系。我们在 MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Embase 中进行了文献检索,检索时间从建库至 2014 年 9 月。我们使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表来评估病例对照、横断面和队列研究的质量,以及 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具来评估 RCT 的质量。

结果

搜索策略确定了 4959 篇文献。筛选后,我们选择了 21 篇文章进行综述(5 篇横断面研究,5 篇队列研究,7 篇病例对照研究,4 篇 RCT)。病例对照研究的荟萃分析显示,与无 DME 患者相比,DME 患者的总血清胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白(LDLs)和血清甘油三酯(TGs)水平明显更高(TC:30.08;95%置信区间 [CI],21.14-39.02;P < 0.001;LDL:18.62;95% CI,5.80-31.43;P < 0.05;TG:24.82;95% CI,9.21-40.42;P < 0.05)。RCT 的荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂相比,降脂组的硬性渗出物恶化和 DME 严重程度没有显著的风险(硬性渗出物:相对风险,1.00;95%CI,0.47-2.11;P=1.00;DME:相对风险,1.18;95%CI,0.75-1.86;P=0.48)。

结论

尽管来自队列研究的证据以及病例对照研究的荟萃分析表明血脂水平与 DME 之间存在很强的关系,但这一结论并未得到仅包含前瞻性 RCT 的荟萃分析的证实。因此,鉴于该主题具有重要的公共卫生相关性,血脂水平与 DME 之间的关系值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验