Poole Phillippa, Chong Jimmy, Cates Christopher J
Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29(7):CD001287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001287.pub5.
Individuals with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may suffer recurrent exacerbations with an increase in volume or purulence of sputum, or both. Personal and healthcare costs associated with exacerbations indicate that any therapy that reduces the occurrence of exacerbations is useful. A marked difference among countries in terms of prescribing of mucolytics reflects variation in perceptions of their effectiveness.
Primary objective• To determine whether treatment with mucolytics reduces frequency of exacerbations and/or days of disability in patients with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Secondary objectives• To assess whether mucolytics lead to improvement in lung function or quality of life.• To determine frequency of adverse effects associated with use of mucolytics.
We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles on 10 separate occasions, most recently in July 2014.
We included randomised studies that compared oral mucolytic therapy versus placebo for at least two months in adults with chronic bronchitis or COPD. We excluded studies of people with asthma and cystic fibrosis.
This review analysed summary data only, most derived from published studies. For earlier versions, one review author extracted data, which were rechecked in subsequent updates. In later versions, review authors double-checked extracted data and then entered data into RevMan for analysis.
We added four studies for the 2014 update. The review now includes 34 trials, recruiting a total of 9367 participants. Many studies did not clearly describe allocation concealment; hence selection bias may have inflated the results, which reduces our confidence in the findings.Results of 26 studies with 6233 participants show that the likelihood that a patient could be exacerbation-free during the study period was greater among mucolytic groups (Peto odds ratio (OR) 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 1.94). However, more recent studies show less benefit of treatment than was reported in earlier studies in this review. The overall number needed to treat with mucolytics for an additional beneficial outcome for an average of 10 months - to keep an additional participant free from exacerbations - was eight (NNTB 8, 95% CI 7 to 10). Use of mucolytics was associated with a reduction of 0.03 exacerbations per participant per month (mean difference (MD) -0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.03; participants = 7164; studies = 28; I(2) = 85%) compared with placebo, that is, about 0.36 per year, or one exacerbation every three years. Very high heterogeneity was noted for this outcome, so results need to be interpreted with caution. The type or dose of mucolytic did not seem to alter the effect size, nor did the severity of COPD, including exacerbation history. Longer studies showed smaller effects of mucolytics than were reported in shorter studies.Mucolytic use was associated with a reduction of 0.43 days of disability per participant per month compared with placebo (95% CI -0.56 to -0.30; studies = 13; I(2) = 61%). With mucolytics, the number of people with one or more hospitalisations was reduced, but study results were not consistent (Peto OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.89; participants = 1788; studies = 4; I(2) = 58%). Investigators reported improved quality of life with mucolytics (MD -2.64, 95% CI -5.21 to -0.08; participants = 2231; studies = 5; I(2) = 51%). Although this mean difference did not reach the minimal clinically important difference of -4 units, we cannot assess the population impact, as we do not have the data needed to carry out a responder analysis. Mucolytic treatment was not associated with any significant increase in the total number of adverse effects, including mortality (Peto OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.03; participants = 2931; studies = 8; I(2) = 0%), but the confidence interval is too wide to confirm that the treatment has no effect on mortality.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In participants with chronic bronchitis or COPD, we are moderately confident that treatment with mucolytics may produce a small reduction in acute exacerbations and a small effect on overall quality of life. Our confidence in the results is reduced by the fact that effects on exacerbations shown in early trials were larger than those reported by more recent studies, possibly because the earlier smaller trials were at greater risk of selection or publication bias, thus benefits of treatment may not be as great as was suggested by previous evidence.
患有慢性支气管炎或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的个体可能会反复出现病情加重,表现为痰液量增加、痰液脓性改变或两者兼有。与病情加重相关的个人和医疗费用表明,任何能够减少病情加重发生的治疗方法都是有益的。各国在黏液溶解剂处方方面存在显著差异,这反映了对其有效性认识的差异。
主要目的•确定黏液溶解剂治疗是否能降低慢性支气管炎或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者病情加重的频率和/或致残天数。次要目的•评估黏液溶解剂是否能改善肺功能或生活质量。•确定使用黏液溶解剂相关不良反应的发生频率。
我们10次检索了Cochrane Airways Group专业注册库及文章参考文献列表,最近一次检索是在2014年7月。
我们纳入了比较口服黏液溶解剂治疗与安慰剂治疗至少两个月的成人慢性支气管炎或COPD随机对照研究。我们排除了哮喘和囊性纤维化患者的研究。
本综述仅分析汇总数据,大部分数据来源于已发表的研究。对于早期版本,由一位综述作者提取数据,并在后续更新中进行重新核对。在后期版本中,综述作者对提取的数据进行了双人核对,然后将数据录入RevMan进行分析。
我们为2014年更新增加了4项研究。本综述现在包括34项试验,共纳入9367名参与者。许多研究没有清晰描述分配隐藏;因此,选择偏倚可能夸大了结果,这降低了我们对研究结果的信心。26项研究共6233名参与者的结果显示,在研究期间,黏液溶解剂组患者无病情加重的可能性更大(Peto比值比(OR)1.75,95%置信区间(CI)1.57至1.94)。然而,最近的研究显示,与本综述早期研究报道相比,治疗的益处较小。使用黏液溶解剂平均治疗10个月以获得额外有益结果(即使额外一名参与者避免病情加重)所需的总治疗人数为8人(NNTB 8,95% CI 7至10)。与安慰剂相比,使用黏液溶解剂可使每位参与者每月病情加重次数减少0.03次(平均差(MD)-0.03,95% CI -0.04至-0.03;参与者 = 7164;研究 = 28;I² = 85%),即每年约0.36次,或每三年一次病情加重。该结果存在非常高的异质性,因此结果解释需谨慎。黏液溶解剂类型或剂量似乎未改变效应大小,COPD严重程度(包括病情加重史)也未改变。较长时间的研究显示黏液溶解剂的效果比短时间研究报道的小。与安慰剂相比,使用黏液溶解剂可使每位参与者每月致残天数减少0.43天(95% CI -0.56至-0.30;研究 = 13;I² = 61%)。使用黏液溶解剂可使住院一次或多次的人数减少,但研究结果不一致(Peto OR 0.68,95% CI 0.52至0.89;参与者 = 1788;研究 = 4;I² = 58%)。研究者报告使用黏液溶解剂可改善生活质量(MD -2.64,95% CI -5.21至-0.08;参与者 = 2231;研究 = 5;I² = 51%)。尽管该平均差未达到最小临床重要差异-4分,但由于我们没有进行反应者分析所需的数据,因此无法评估对总体人群的影响。黏液溶解剂治疗与包括死亡率在内的不良反应总数无显著增加相关(Peto OR 1.03,95% CI 0.52至2.03;参与者 = 2931;研究 = 8;I² = 0%),但置信区间过宽,无法确定该治疗对死亡率无影响。
对于慢性支气管炎或COPD患者,我们有中等程度的信心认为,黏液溶解剂治疗可能会使急性加重略有减少,并对总体生活质量有轻微影响,但早期试验显示的对病情加重的影响大于近期研究报道,可能是因为早期较小规模试验存在更大的选择或发表偏倚风险,因此治疗的益处可能不如先前证据所提示的那么大,这降低了我们对结果的信心。