Guarneri Valentina, Dieci Maria Vittoria, Frassoldati Antonio, Maiorana Antonino, Ficarra Guido, Bettelli Stefania, Tagliafico Enrico, Bicciato Silvio, Generali Daniele Giulio, Cagossi Katia, Bisagni Giancarlo, Sarti Samanta, Musolino Antonino, Ellis Catherine, Crescenzo Rocco, Conte PierFranco
Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy; Division of Oncology, University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy; Division of Pathology, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy; Center for Genome Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Unità Operativa Multidisciplinare di Patologia Mammaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ramazzini Hospital, Carpi, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Parma, Italy; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy; Division of Oncology, University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy; Division of Pathology, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy; Center for Genome Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Unità Operativa Multidisciplinare di Patologia Mammaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Ramazzini Hospital, Carpi, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Parma, Italy; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
Oncologist. 2015 Sep;20(9):1001-10. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0138. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
The CHER-LOB randomized phase II study showed that the combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy increases the pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate compared with chemotherapy plus either trastuzumab or lapatinib. A biomarker program was prospectively planned to identify potential predictors of sensitivity to different treatments and to evaluate treatment effect on tumor biomarkers.
Overall, 121 breast cancer patients positive for human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both trastuzumab and lapatinib. Pre- and post-treatment samples were centrally evaluated for HER2, p95-HER2, phosphorylated AKT (pAKT), phosphatase and tensin homolog, Ki67, apoptosis, and PIK3CA mutations. Fresh-frozen tissue samples were collected for genomic analyses.
A mutation in PIK3CA exon 20 or 9 was documented in 20% of cases. Overall, the pCR rates were similar in PIK3CA wild-type and PIK3CA-mutated patients (33.3% vs. 22.7%; p = .323). For patients receiving trastuzumab plus lapatinib, the probability of pCR was higher in PIK3CA wild-type tumors (48.4% vs. 12.5%; p = .06). Ki67, pAKT, and apoptosis measured on the residual disease were significantly reduced from baseline. The degree of Ki67 inhibition was significantly higher in patients receiving the dual anti-HER2 blockade. The integrated analysis of gene expression and copy number data demonstrated that a 50-gene signature specifically predicted the lapatinib-induced pCR.
PIK3CA mutations seem to identify patients who are less likely to benefit from dual anti-HER2 inhibition. p95-HER2 and markers of phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway deregulation are not confirmed as markers of different sensitivity to trastuzumab or lapatinib.
HER2 is currently the only validated marker to select breast cancer patients for anti-HER2 treatment; however, it is becoming evident that HER2-positive breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. In addition, more and more new anti-HER2 treatments are becoming available. There is a need to identify markers of sensitivity to different treatments to move in the direction of treatment personalization. This study identified PIK3CA mutations as a potential predictive marker of resistance to dual anti-HER2 treatment that should be further studied in breast cancer.
CHER-LOB随机II期研究表明,与化疗联合曲妥珠单抗或拉帕替尼相比,拉帕替尼、曲妥珠单抗联合化疗可提高病理完全缓解(pCR)率。前瞻性规划了一个生物标志物项目,以识别对不同治疗敏感性的潜在预测指标,并评估治疗对肿瘤生物标志物的影响。
总共121例人表皮生长因子2(HER2)阳性乳腺癌患者被随机分配接受新辅助化疗联合曲妥珠单抗、拉帕替尼,或曲妥珠单抗与拉帕替尼联合治疗。对治疗前和治疗后的样本进行集中评估,检测HER2、p95-HER2、磷酸化AKT(pAKT)、磷酸酶和张力蛋白同源物、Ki67、凋亡情况以及PIK3CA突变。收集新鲜冷冻组织样本进行基因组分析。
20%的病例记录到PIK3CA外显子20或9发生突变。总体而言,PIK3CA野生型和PIK3CA突变型患者的pCR率相似(33.3%对22.7%;p = 0.323)。对于接受曲妥珠单抗联合拉帕替尼治疗的患者,PIK3CA野生型肿瘤的pCR概率更高(48.4%对12.5%;p = 0.06)。对残留病灶检测的Ki67、pAKT和凋亡情况较基线水平显著降低。接受双重抗HER2阻断治疗的患者中,Ki67的抑制程度显著更高。基因表达和拷贝数数据的综合分析表明,一个50基因特征可特异性预测拉帕替尼诱导的pCR。
PIK3CA突变似乎可识别出不太可能从双重抗HER2抑制治疗中获益的患者。p95-HER2和磷酸肌醇3激酶通路失调标志物未被证实为对曲妥珠单抗或拉帕替尼不同敏感性的标志物。
HER2目前是唯一经证实的用于选择乳腺癌患者进行抗HER2治疗的标志物;然而,越来越明显的是,HER2阳性乳腺癌是一种异质性疾病。此外,越来越多的新型抗HER2治疗方法可供使用。需要识别对不同治疗敏感性的标志物,以朝着治疗个体化的方向发展。本研究确定PIK3CA突变是对双重抗HER2治疗耐药的潜在预测标志物,应在乳腺癌中进一步研究。