Centre for the Economics and Management of Aquatic Resources (CEMARE), University of Portsmouth, St George's Building, 141 High Street, Portsmouth PO1 2HY, United Kingdom.
School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Burnaby Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, United Kingdom.
Waste Manag. 2015 Dec;46:637-45. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
Solid waste management has become a major issue in almost all municipalities especially in developing countries across the world. As more waste needs to be collected and disposed of in urban areas, the increased cost cannot be covered by the available funds in developing countries. Managing the Household Solid Waste (HSW) sector is very important as it is the main contributor of the waste that needs to be collected in residential areas. The reduction of the amount of HSW to be disposed of can be achieved by households themselves practising the "4R" activities: reducing, reusing, recycling and recovering. As a policy instrument, the Waste Management Charge (WMC) for HSW has shown much success in encouraging such activities all over the world. Given the already difficult context in which developing countries operate, it is important to careful consider what kind of charging system is implemented. Using available literature, this paper reviews the applicability of available charging methods, from a flat rate method, through to volume-based (bags, cans or tag/sticker) and weight-based charging methods. These charging methods were evaluated on the basis of overall cost, technology need possible other issues. By considering the conditions in developing countries, a 'pre-paid bag based charging method' could be suggested as the most suitable charging method for a WMC in Sri Lanka or other developing countries. The potential applicability of this method was also examined in the context of social, economic and political characteristics. Whilst the use of economic instruments, including WMC, was widely discussed in the literature, the selection of a charging method in the context of developing countries is rarely discussed. Having said that, this paper gives an insight to the policy makers in developing countries upon using pre-paid bag based charging method for HSW sector. It also provides recommendations regarding possible issues in implementing for developing countries where there is an absence of such a Quantity-Based Charging (QBC) system for the HSW sector.
固体废物管理已成为几乎所有城市的主要问题,尤其是在全球发展中国家。随着城市地区需要收集和处理的垃圾量增加,发展中国家现有的可用资金无法承担增加的成本。管理家庭固体废物(HSW)部门非常重要,因为它是需要在居民区收集的主要垃圾来源。家庭通过实践“4R”活动(减少、再利用、回收和再利用),可以减少需要处理的 HSW 数量。作为一种政策手段,HSW 的废物管理收费(WMC)已在全球范围内成功地鼓励了此类活动。考虑到发展中国家已经面临的困难情况,重要的是要仔细考虑实施哪种收费系统。本文利用现有文献,审查了从固定费率方法到基于体积(袋子、罐子或标签/贴纸)和基于重量的收费方法等各种收费方法的适用性。这些收费方法是根据总成本、技术需求和可能存在的其他问题进行评估的。通过考虑发展中国家的情况,可以建议采用“预付费袋收费方法”作为斯里兰卡或其他发展中国家 WMC 最适合的收费方法。还根据社会、经济和政治特征审查了这种方法的潜在适用性。虽然包括 WMC 在内的经济手段的使用在文献中得到了广泛讨论,但在发展中国家的背景下选择收费方法却很少讨论。话虽如此,本文为发展中国家的政策制定者提供了一些启示,即在 HSW 部门使用预付费袋收费方法。它还就发展中国家可能存在的与 HSW 部门缺乏 QBC 系统相关的问题提出了建议。