Polage Christopher R, Gyorke Clare E, Kennedy Michael A, Leslie Jhansi L, Chin David L, Wang Susan, Nguyen Hien H, Huang Bin, Tang Yi-Wei, Lee Lenora W, Kim Kyoungmi, Taylor Sandra, Romano Patrick S, Panacek Edward A, Goodell Parker B, Solnick Jay V, Cohen Stuart H
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114.
Clostridium difficile is a major cause of health care-associated infection, but disagreement between diagnostic tests is an ongoing barrier to clinical decision making and public health reporting. Molecular tests are increasingly used to diagnose C difficile infection (CDI), but many molecular test-positive patients lack toxins that historically defined disease, making it unclear if they need treatment.
To determine the natural history and need for treatment of patients who are toxin immunoassay negative and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive (Tox-/PCR+) for CDI.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational cohort study at a single academic medical center among 1416 hospitalized adults tested for C difficile toxins 72 hours or longer after admission between December 1, 2010, and October 20, 2012. The analysis was conducted in stages with revisions from April 27, 2013, to January 13, 2015.
Patients undergoing C difficile testing were grouped by US Food and Drug Administration-approved toxin and PCR tests as Tox+/PCR+, Tox-/PCR+, or Tox-/PCR-. Toxin results were reported clinically. Polymerase chain reaction results were not reported. The main study outcomes were duration of diarrhea during up to 14 days of treatment, rate of CDI-related complications (ie, colectomy, megacolon, or intensive care unit care) and CDI-related death within 30 days.
Twenty-one percent (293 of 1416) of hospitalized adults tested for C difficile were positive by PCR, but 44.7% (131 of 293) had toxins detected by the clinical toxin test. At baseline, Tox-/PCR+ patients had lower C difficile bacterial load and less antibiotic exposure, fecal inflammation, and diarrhea than Tox+/PCR+ patients (P < .001 for all). The median duration of diarrhea was shorter in Tox-/PCR+ patients (2 days; interquartile range, 1-4 days) than in Tox+/PCR+ patients (3 days; interquartile range, 1-6 days) (P = .003) and was similar to that in Tox-/PCR- patients (2 days; interquartile range, 1-3 days), despite minimal empirical treatment of Tox-/PCR+ patients. No CDI-related complications occurred in Tox-/PCR+ patients vs 10 complications in Tox+/PCR+ patients (0% vs 7.6%, P < .001). One Tox-/PCR+ patient had recurrent CDI as a contributing factor to death within 30 days vs 11 CDI-related deaths in Tox+/PCR+ patients (0.6% vs 8.4%, P = .001).
Among hospitalized adults with suspected CDI, virtually all CDI-related complications and deaths occurred in patients with positive toxin immunoassay test results. Patients with a positive molecular test result and a negative toxin immunoassay test result had outcomes that were comparable to patients without C difficile by either method. Exclusive reliance on molecular tests for CDI diagnosis without tests for toxins or host response is likely to result in overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and increased health care costs.
艰难梭菌是医疗保健相关感染的主要原因,但诊断测试之间的分歧一直是临床决策和公共卫生报告的障碍。分子检测越来越多地用于诊断艰难梭菌感染(CDI),但许多分子检测呈阳性的患者缺乏以往定义疾病的毒素,这使得他们是否需要治疗尚不清楚。
确定毒素免疫测定阴性且聚合酶链反应(PCR)阳性(Tox-/PCR+)的CDI患者的自然病程和治疗需求。
设计、设置和参与者:在一家学术医疗中心进行的前瞻性观察队列研究,研究对象为2010年12月1日至2012年10月20日期间入院72小时或更长时间后接受艰难梭菌毒素检测的1416名住院成人。分析分阶段进行,于2013年4月27日至2015年1月13日进行修订。
接受艰难梭菌检测的患者根据美国食品药品监督管理局批准的毒素和PCR检测分为Tox+/PCR+、Tox-/PCR+或Tox-/PCR-。毒素检测结果按临床报告。PCR检测结果未报告。主要研究结局为治疗14天内的腹泻持续时间、CDI相关并发症(即结肠切除术、巨结肠或重症监护病房护理)发生率以及30天内CDI相关死亡率。
接受艰难梭菌检测的住院成人中,21%(1416例中的293例)PCR检测呈阳性,但临床毒素检测发现44.7%(293例中的131例)有毒素。基线时,Tox-/PCR+患者的艰难梭菌细菌载量较低,抗生素暴露、粪便炎症和腹泻程度均低于Tox+/PCR+患者(所有P值均<0.001)。Tox-/PCR+患者的腹泻中位持续时间(两天;四分位间距,1 - 4天)短于Tox+/PCR+患者(三天;四分位间距,1 - 6天)(P = 0.003),与Tox-/PCR-患者(两天;四分位间距,1 - 3天)相似,尽管Tox-/PCR+患者接受的经验性治疗很少。Tox-/PCR+患者未发生CDI相关并发症,而Tox+/PCR+患者发生了10例并发症(0%对7.6%,P < 0.001)。1例Tox-/PCR+患者在30天内发生复发性CDI并作为死亡的一个促成因素,而Tox+/PCR+患者有11例CDI相关死亡(0.6%对8.4%,P = 0.001)。
在疑似CDI的住院成人中,几乎所有CDI相关并发症和死亡均发生在毒素免疫测定结果为阳性的患者中。分子检测结果为阳性且毒素免疫测定结果为阴性的患者的结局与两种检测方法均未检测到艰难梭菌的患者相当。仅依靠分子检测诊断CDI而不进行毒素或宿主反应检测可能会导致过度诊断、过度治疗以及医疗保健成本增加。