Miller Ann C, Murray Megan B, Thomson Dana R, Arbour Mary Catherine
1Department of Global Health and Social Medicine,Harvard Medical School,641 Huntington Avenue,Boston,MA 02115,USA.
3Division of Global Health Equity,Brigham and Women's Hospital,Boston,MA,USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun;19(8):1339-47. doi: 10.1017/S136898001500227X. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
Despite documented associations between stunting and cognitive development, few population-level studies have measured both indicators in individual children or assessed stunting's associations with other developmental domains.
Meta-analysis using publicly available data from fifteen Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS-4) to assess the association between stunting and development, controlling for maternal education, family wealth, books in the home, developmentally supportive parenting and sex of the child, stratified by country prevalence of breast-feeding ('low BF'<90 %, 'high BF' ≥90 %). Ten-item Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) scores assessed physical, learning, literacy/numeracy and socio-emotional developmental domains. Children on track in three or four domains were considered 'on-track' overall.
Fifteen low- and middle-income countries.
Publically available data from 58 513 children aged 36-59 months.
Severe stunting (height-for-age Z-score <-3) was negatively associated with on-track development (OR=0·75; 95 % CI 0·67, 0·83). Any stunting (Z-score <-2) was negatively associated with on-track development in countries with high BF prevalence (OR=0·82; 95 % CI 0·75, 0·89). Severe and any stunting were negatively associated with physical development (OR=0·77; 95 % CI 0·66, 0·89 and OR=0·82; 95 % CI 0·74, 0·91, respectively) and literacy/numeracy development in high BF countries (OR=0·45; 95 % CI 0·38, 0·53 and OR=0·59, 95 % CI 0·51, 0·68, respectively), but not low BF countries (OR=0·93; 95 % CI 0·70, 1·23 and OR=0·95, 95 % CI 0·79, 1·12, respectively). Any stunting was negatively associated with learning (OR=0·79; 95 % CI 0·72, 0·88). There was no clear association between stunting and socio-emotional development.
Stunting is associated with many but not all developmental domains across a diversity of countries and cultures. However, associations varied by country breast-feeding prevalence and developmental domain.
尽管已有文献记载发育迟缓与认知发展之间存在关联,但很少有基于人群的研究对个体儿童的这两项指标进行测量,或评估发育迟缓与其他发育领域的关联。
使用来自15项多指标类集调查(MICS - 4)的公开数据进行荟萃分析,以评估发育迟缓与发育之间的关联,同时控制母亲教育程度、家庭财富、家中藏书、支持性养育方式以及儿童性别,并按母乳喂养的国家患病率进行分层(“低母乳喂养率”<90%,“高母乳喂养率”≥90%)。通过10项幼儿发展指数(ECDI)得分评估身体、学习、读写/算术和社会情感发育领域。在三个或四个领域达标的儿童被视为总体“达标”。
15个低收入和中等收入国家。
来自58513名36 - 59个月儿童的公开数据。
重度发育迟缓(年龄别身高Z评分<-3)与达标发育呈负相关(比值比=0.75;95%置信区间0.67,0.83)。在高母乳喂养率国家,任何程度的发育迟缓(Z评分<-2)与达标发育呈负相关(比值比=0.82;95%置信区间0.75,0.89)。重度和任何程度的发育迟缓与身体发育呈负相关(分别为比值比=0.77;95%置信区间0.66,0.89和比值比=0.82;95%置信区间0.74,0.91),在高母乳喂养率国家与读写/算术发育呈负相关(分别为比值比=0.45;95%置信区间0.38,0.53和比值比=0.59,95%置信区间0.51,0.68),但在低母乳喂养率国家则无此关联(分别为比值比=0.93;95%置信区间0.70,1.23和比值比=0.95,95%置信区间0.79,1.12)。任何程度的发育迟缓与学习呈负相关(比值比=0.79;95%置信区间0.72,0.88)。发育迟缓与社会情感发育之间无明显关联。
发育迟缓与不同国家和文化中的许多但并非所有发育领域相关。然而,这种关联因国家母乳喂养患病率和发育领域的不同而有所差异。