Menzies School of Health Research; and Respiratory Deptartment, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia.
Division of Allergy and Immunology, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Cedar Knolls, NJ.
Chest. 2016 Jan;149(1):106-19. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-1403. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
Use of appropriate cough pathways or algorithms may reduce the morbidity of chronic cough, lead to earlier diagnosis of chronic underlying illness, and reduce unnecessary costs and medications. We undertook three systematic reviews to examine three related key questions (KQ): In children aged ?14 years with chronic cough (> 4 weeks' duration), KQ1, do cough management protocols (or algorithms) improve clinical outcomes? KQ2, should the cough management or testing algorithm differ depending on the duration and/or severity? KQ3, should the cough management or testing algorithm differ depending on the associated characteristics of the cough and clinical history?
We used the CHEST expert cough panel's protocol. Two authors screened searches and selected and extracted data. Only systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cohort studies published in English were included.
Data were presented in Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses flowcharts and summary tabulated. Nine studies were included in KQ1 (RCT = 1; cohort studies = 7) and eight in KQ3 (RCT = 2; cohort = 6), but none in KQ2.
There is high-quality evidence that in children aged ?14 years with chronic cough (> 4 weeks' duration), the use of cough management protocols (or algorithms) improves clinical outcomes and cough management or the testing algorithm should differ depending on the associated characteristics of the cough and clinical history. It remains uncertain whether the management or testing algorithm should depend on the duration or severity of chronic cough. Pending new data, chronic cough in children should be defined as > 4 weeks' duration and children should be systematically evaluated with treatment targeted to the underlying cause irrespective of the cough severity.
使用适当的咳嗽途径或算法可以降低慢性咳嗽的发病率,有助于更早地诊断慢性潜在疾病,并减少不必要的费用和药物治疗。我们进行了三项系统评价,以检查三个相关的关键问题(KQ):在年龄大于 14 岁的慢性咳嗽(持续时间大于 4 周)的儿童中,KQ1,咳嗽管理方案(或算法)是否能改善临床结果?KQ2,咳嗽管理或测试算法是否应根据持续时间和/或严重程度而有所不同?KQ3,咳嗽管理或测试算法是否应根据咳嗽的相关特征和临床病史而有所不同?
我们使用 CHEST 专家咳嗽小组的方案。两位作者筛选搜索结果并选择和提取数据。仅纳入以英文发表的系统评价、随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究。
数据以系统评价和荟萃分析流程图和摘要表格形式呈现。KQ1 纳入了 9 项研究(RCT=1;队列研究=7),KQ3 纳入了 8 项研究(RCT=2;队列研究=6),但 KQ2 没有研究纳入。
有高质量证据表明,在年龄大于 14 岁的慢性咳嗽(持续时间大于 4 周)的儿童中,使用咳嗽管理方案(或算法)可以改善临床结果,咳嗽管理或测试算法应根据咳嗽的相关特征和临床病史而有所不同。目前尚不确定管理或测试算法是否应取决于慢性咳嗽的持续时间或严重程度。在等待新数据的情况下,儿童慢性咳嗽应定义为持续时间大于 4 周,无论咳嗽严重程度如何,都应系统地评估儿童并针对潜在病因进行治疗。