Manlove Luke S, Berquam-Vrieze Katherine E, Pauken Kristen E, Williams Richard T, Jenkins Marc K, Farrar Michael A
Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455;
Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455;
J Immunol. 2015 Oct 15;195(8):4028-37. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501291. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
BCR-ABL(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients have transient responses to current therapies. However, the fusion of BCR to ABL generates a potential leukemia-specific Ag that could be a target for immunotherapy. We demonstrate that the immune system can limit BCR-ABL(+) leukemia progression although ultimately this immune response fails. To address how BCR-ABL(+) leukemia escapes immune surveillance, we developed a peptide: MHC class II tetramer that labels endogenous BCR-ABL-specific CD4(+) T cells. Naive mice harbored a small population of BCR-ABL-specific T cells that proliferated modestly upon immunization. The small number of naive BCR-ABL-specific T cells was due to negative selection in the thymus, which depleted BCR-ABL-specific T cells. Consistent with this observation, we saw that BCR-ABL-specific T cells were cross-reactive with an endogenous peptide derived from ABL. Despite this cross-reactivity, the remaining population of BCR-ABL reactive T cells proliferated upon immunization with the BCR-ABL fusion peptide and adjuvant. In response to BCR-ABL(+) leukemia, BCR-ABL-specific T cells proliferated and converted into regulatory T (Treg) cells, a process that was dependent on cross-reactivity with self-antigen, TGF-β1, and MHC class II Ag presentation by leukemic cells. Treg cells were critical for leukemia progression in C57BL/6 mice, as transient Treg cell ablation led to extended survival of leukemic mice. Thus, BCR-ABL(+) leukemia actively suppresses antileukemia immune responses by converting cross-reactive leukemia-specific T cells into Treg cells.
BCR-ABL(阳性)急性淋巴细胞白血病患者对当前治疗有短暂反应。然而,BCR与ABL的融合产生了一种潜在的白血病特异性抗原,它可能成为免疫治疗的靶点。我们证明,尽管最终这种免疫反应失败,但免疫系统可以限制BCR-ABL(阳性)白血病的进展。为了研究BCR-ABL(阳性)白血病如何逃避免疫监视,我们开发了一种肽:MHC II类四聚体,用于标记内源性BCR-ABL特异性CD4(阳性)T细胞。未接触过抗原的小鼠体内存在一小群BCR-ABL特异性T细胞,免疫后它们会适度增殖。未接触过抗原的BCR-ABL特异性T细胞数量较少是由于胸腺中的阴性选择,这种选择会消耗BCR-ABL特异性T细胞。与这一观察结果一致,我们发现BCR-ABL特异性T细胞与源自ABL的内源性肽具有交叉反应性。尽管存在这种交叉反应性,但剩余的BCR-ABL反应性T细胞群体在用BCR-ABL融合肽和佐剂免疫后仍会增殖。针对BCR-ABL(阳性)白血病,BCR-ABL特异性T细胞增殖并转化为调节性T(Treg)细胞,这一过程依赖于与自身抗原的交叉反应性、转化生长因子-β1以及白血病细胞的MHC II类抗原呈递。Treg细胞对C57BL/6小鼠的白血病进展至关重要,因为短暂消除Treg细胞可延长白血病小鼠的生存期。因此,BCR-ABL(阳性)白血病通过将交叉反应性白血病特异性T细胞转化为Treg细胞来积极抑制抗白血病免疫反应。