Muratore Francesco, Cavazza Alberto, Boiardi Luigi, Lo Gullo Alberto, Pipitone Nicolò, Germanò Giuseppe, Bisagni Alessandra, Cimino Luca, Salvarani Carlo
Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jun;68(6):865-70. doi: 10.1002/acr.22736.
To evaluate whether there are histopathologic features of negative temporal artery biopsy (TAB) that allow differentiation between patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and those without.
All consecutive patients with negative TAB seen between January 2009 and December 2012 were selected retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data at presentation and at each followup visit were collected. A pathologist with expertise in vasculitis and blinded to clinical data and final diagnosis reviewed all negative TABs. Histopathologic features evaluated were the presence of a focal mediointimal scar, medial attenuation, intimal hyperplasia, fragmentation of inner elastic lamina, calcification, adventitial fibrosis, and neoangiogenesis.
After a median (interquartile range [IQR]) followup period of, respectively, 19 months (9.2-31.2) and 26.3 months (4.9-36.7) (P = 0.041), 38 (55%) of 69 patients had a final diagnosis of TAB-negative GCA, while in the remaining 31 (45%) of 69 patients GCA was excluded. The American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for GCA were satisfied by 31 (81.6%) of 38 patients and 2 (6.5%) of 31 patients (P < 0.0001). Compared to non-GCA patients, those with TAB-negative GCA had more frequent cranial manifestations and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive protein levels. The frequency of patients receiving prednisone, the mean dose, and the duration of prednisone treatment at TAB were similar in the 2 groups. There were no significant differences between TAB-negative GCA and non-GCA patients in the frequencies of all the histologic features evaluated.
The histologic features of negative TABs evaluated in this study do not allow for the differentiation between GCA and non-GCA patients. In the absence of an inflammatory infiltrate, other histologic changes of the temporal artery wall are not specific for GCA.
评估颞动脉活检(TAB)阴性的组织病理学特征是否有助于区分巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者和非GCA患者。
回顾性选取2009年1月至2012年12月期间所有连续的TAB阴性患者。收集就诊时及每次随访时的人口统计学、临床和实验室数据。一位血管炎专家病理学家在不知晓临床数据和最终诊断的情况下对所有TAB阴性标本进行复查。评估的组织病理学特征包括局灶性中膜内膜瘢痕、中膜变薄、内膜增生、内弹力层断裂、钙化、外膜纤维化和新生血管形成。
在分别为19个月(9.2 - 31.2)和26.3个月(4.9 - 36.7)的中位(四分位间距[IQR])随访期后(P = 0.041),69例患者中有38例(55%)最终诊断为TAB阴性GCA,而其余69例患者中的31例(45%)排除了GCA。38例患者中有31例(81.6%)、31例患者中有2例(6.5%)符合美国风湿病学会GCA分类标准(P < 0.0001)。与非GCA患者相比,TAB阴性GCA患者有更频繁的颅部表现以及更高的红细胞沉降率和C反应蛋白水平。两组患者在TAB时接受泼尼松治疗的频率、平均剂量和泼尼松治疗持续时间相似。在所有评估的组织学特征频率方面,TAB阴性GCA患者和非GCA患者之间无显著差异。
本研究中评估的TAB阴性的组织学特征无法区分GCA患者和非GCA患者。在没有炎性浸润的情况下,颞动脉壁的其他组织学改变对GCA不具有特异性。