Lonni Sara, Chalmers James D, Goeminne Pieter C, McDonnell Melissa J, Dimakou Katerina, De Soyza Anthony, Polverino Eva, Van de Kerkhove Charlotte, Rutherford Robert, Davison John, Rosales Edmundo, Pesci Alberto, Restrepo Marcos I, Torres Antoni, Aliberti Stefano
1 Health Science Department, University of Milan Bicocca, Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
2 Tayside Respiratory Research Group, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Dec;12(12):1764-70. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-472OC.
Testing for underlying etiology is a key part of bronchiectasis management, but it is unclear whether the same extent of testing is required across the spectrum of disease severity.
The aim of the present study was to identify the etiology of bronchiectasis across European cohorts and according to different levels of disease severity.
We conducted an analysis of seven databases of adult outpatients with bronchiectasis prospectively enrolled at the bronchiectasis clinics of university teaching hospitals in Monza, Italy; Dundee and Newcastle, United Kingdom; Leuven, Belgium; Barcelona, Spain; Athens, Greece; and Galway, Ireland. All the patients at every site underwent the same comprehensive diagnostic workup as suggested by the British Thoracic Society.
Among the 1,258 patients enrolled, an etiology of bronchiectasis was determined in 60%, including postinfective (20%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease related (15%), connective tissue disease related (10%), immunodeficiency related (5.8%), and asthma related (3.3%). An etiology leading to a change in patient's management was identified in 13% of the cases. No significant differences in the etiology of bronchiectasis were present across different levels of disease severity, with the exception of a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related bronchiectasis (P < 0.001) and a lower prevalence of idiopathic bronchiectasis (P = 0.029) in patients with severe disease.
Physicians should not be guided by disease severity in suspecting specific etiologies in patients with bronchiectasis, although idiopathic bronchiectasis appears to be less common in patients with the most severe disease.
检测潜在病因是支气管扩张症管理的关键部分,但对于疾病严重程度不同的患者,是否需要进行同样全面的检测尚不清楚。
本研究旨在确定欧洲队列中支气管扩张症的病因,并根据疾病严重程度的不同水平进行分析。
我们对七个数据库进行了分析,这些数据库来自意大利蒙扎、英国邓迪和纽卡斯尔、比利时鲁汶、西班牙巴塞罗那、希腊雅典和爱尔兰戈尔韦的大学教学医院支气管扩张症诊所前瞻性纳入的成年门诊患者。每个研究点的所有患者都接受了英国胸科学会建议的相同全面诊断检查。
在纳入的1258例患者中,60%的患者确定了支气管扩张症的病因,包括感染后(20%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病相关(15%)、结缔组织病相关(10%)、免疫缺陷相关(5.8%)和哮喘相关(3.3%)。13%的病例中确定了导致患者治疗方案改变的病因。不同疾病严重程度水平的支气管扩张症病因无显著差异,但严重疾病患者中慢性阻塞性肺疾病相关支气管扩张症的患病率较高(P < 0.001),特发性支气管扩张症的患病率较低(P = 0.029)。
在怀疑支气管扩张症患者的特定病因时,医生不应受疾病严重程度的影响,尽管特发性支气管扩张症在最严重疾病的患者中似乎不太常见。