Cunill R, Castells X, Tobias A, Capellà D
Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Clinical Pharmacology Unit, TransLab Research Group, Department of Medical Sciences, Universitat de Girona, Emili Grahit, 77, 17071, Girona, Spain.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jan;233(2):187-97. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4099-3. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
The factors underlying the variability in the results of randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RPCCT) assessing pharmacological interventions for adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are not fully understood.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of RPCCT comparing pharmacological treatment and placebo in adults with ADHD was carried out. The study outcomes were all-cause treatment discontinuation, efficacy on ADHD symptoms, and safety. Patient-, intervention-, and study design-related covariates were collected. Meta-regression methods were applied.
Forty-four studies involving 9952 patients were included. All-cause treatment discontinuation was slightly higher with pharmacological treatment than with placebo (odds ratio (OR) = 1.18; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02, 1.36; p = 0.003). A better outcome on all-cause treatment discontinuation was observed in studies that provided concomitant psychotherapy when compared to those that did not (rate of OR (ROR) = 0.68, p = 0.048). Pharmacological treatment was efficacious for reducing ADHD symptoms (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.45; 95 % CI 0.37, 0.52; p < 0.00001), with stronger intervention effects found in studies investigating stimulant drugs (difference of SMD (Diff SMD) = 0.18, p = 0.017), in shorter studies (Diff SMD = -0.01, p = 0.044), and when clinician-rated scales were used (Diff SMD = 0.44, p < 0.0001). Pharmacological treatment was associated with more frequent adverse events (AEs) (OR = 2.29; 95 % CI 1.97, 2.66; p = 0.006). Studies with a lead-in phase and with a higher proportion of patients previously treated with stimulants were associated with a better safety outcome (ROR = 0.59, p = 0.017; ROR = 0.98, p = 0.036, respectively).
Pharmacological treatment provides mild symptom improvement but is associated with frequent AEs and higher treatment discontinuation than placebo, particularly when no concomitant psychotherapy is administered. Stimulants appear more efficacious than non-stimulant drugs and the former should be preferred over the latter. The efficacy of pharmacological treatment should be monitored over time because it may decrease progressively.
评估针对成人注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的药物干预措施的随机、安慰剂对照临床试验(RPCCT)结果存在变异性,其背后的因素尚未完全明确。
对比较成人ADHD药物治疗与安慰剂的RPCCT进行系统评价和荟萃分析。研究结局包括全因治疗中断、对ADHD症状的疗效及安全性。收集了与患者、干预措施及研究设计相关的协变量。应用了荟萃回归方法。
纳入了44项研究,涉及9952例患者。药物治疗的全因治疗中断率略高于安慰剂(优势比(OR)=1.18;95%置信区间(CI)1.02, 1.36;p = 0.003)。与未提供辅助心理治疗的研究相比,提供辅助心理治疗的研究在全因治疗中断方面有更好的结局(优势比率(ROR)=0.68,p = 0.048)。药物治疗对减轻ADHD症状有效(标准化均数差(SMD)=0.45;95% CI 0.37, 0.52;p < 0.00001),在研究兴奋剂药物的研究中干预效果更强(SMD差值(Diff SMD)=0.18,p = 0.017),在较短的研究中(Diff SMD = -0.01,p = 0.044),以及使用临床医生评定量表时(Diff SMD = 0.44,p < 0.0001)。药物治疗与更频繁的不良事件(AE)相关(OR = 2.29;95% CI 1.97, 2.66;p = 0.006)。有导入期且先前接受过兴奋剂治疗的患者比例较高的研究与更好的安全性结局相关(ROR = 0.59,p = 0.017;ROR = 0.98,p = 0.036,分别)。
药物治疗可使症状略有改善,但与频繁的AE及高于安慰剂的治疗中断率相关,尤其是在未给予辅助心理治疗时。兴奋剂似乎比非兴奋剂药物更有效,应优先选用前者。应随时间监测药物治疗的疗效,因为其疗效可能会逐渐降低。