Suppr超能文献

单相或双相自杀未遂者的决策制定。

Decision-making in unipolar or bipolar suicide attempters.

作者信息

Richard-Devantoy Stéphane, Olié Emilie, Guillaume Sébastien, Courtet Philippe

机构信息

McGill University, Department of Psychiatry & Douglas Mental Health University, Institute McGill Group for Suicide Studies, FBC Building, 3rd floor, 6875 Boulevard Lasalle, Montréal (Québec), & Hôpital Régional de Saint-Jérôme, Saint-Jérôme, Québec, Canada; Laboratoire de Psychologie des Pays de la Loire EA 4638, Université de Nantes et Angers, France.

Université Montpellier & CHU Montpellier & Inserm, U1061 Montpellier, France.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Disadvantageous decision-making (mainly measured by the Iowa Gambling Task) has been demonstrated in patients with suicidal behavior compared to controls. We, therefore, aimed at clarifying the qualitative and quantitative relationship between decision-making and the risk of suicidal behavior in unipolar and bipolar disorders respectively, as well as establishing the strength of this relationship.

METHODS

(1) We conducted a cross-sectional study comparing IGT performances between 141 unipolar suicide attempters and 57 bipolar suicide attempters. (2) We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies comparing IGT performances in patients with vs. without a history of suicidal acts in bipolar and unipolar disorder, together and separately.

RESULTS

(1) Among suicide attempters, bipolar and unipolar groups performed similarly (t(195)=-0.7; p=0.48). Unipolar non-attempters performed better IGT than unipolar suicide attempters (t(221)=3.1; p=0.002), only in female gender, whereas performances were similar in bipolar patients whatever the history of suicide attempt (t(77)=-0.3; p=0.7). (2) A meta-analysis of 10 studies confirmed significantly impaired decision-making with a moderate effect-size (-0.38 (95% CI[-0.61--0.16]; z=-3.3; p=0.001) in unipolar disorder and (g=-0.4 (95% CI[-0.75 to -0.05]; z=-2.2; p<0.026) in bipolar disorder suicide attempters compared to unipolar and bipolar non-attempters, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

It was not possible to analyse according to the level of lethality attempt.

CONCLUSION

Overall, a strong significant association was found between decision-making and the risk of suicidal behavior in unipolar disorder and bipolar disorder. However, further neuropsychological studies need to analyse separately unipolar and bipolar disorder and to study gender differences.

摘要

目的

与对照组相比,自杀行为患者已被证明存在不利决策(主要通过爱荷华赌博任务衡量)。因此,我们旨在分别阐明单相和双相情感障碍患者决策与自杀行为风险之间的定性和定量关系,并确定这种关系的强度。

方法

(1)我们进行了一项横断面研究,比较了141名单相自杀未遂者和57名双相自杀未遂者的爱荷华赌博任务表现。(2)我们对比较双相和单相情感障碍中有与无自杀行为史患者的爱荷华赌博任务表现的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,包括合并分析和单独分析。

结果

(1)在自杀未遂者中,双相和单相组表现相似(t(195)= -0.7;p = 0.48)。仅在女性中,单相非自杀未遂者的爱荷华赌博任务表现优于单相自杀未遂者(t(221)= 3.1;p = 0.002),而双相患者无论自杀未遂史如何表现相似(t(77)= -0.3;p = 0.7)。(2)对10项研究的荟萃分析证实,与单相和双相非自杀未遂者相比,单相情感障碍自杀未遂者的决策能力显著受损,效应量中等(-0.38(95%CI[-0.61--0.16];z = -3.3;p = 0.001),双相情感障碍自杀未遂者为(g = -0.4(95%CI[-0.75至-0.05];z = -2.2;p < 0.026)。

局限性

无法根据自杀未遂的致死程度进行分析。

结论

总体而言,在单相情感障碍和双相情感障碍中,决策与自杀行为风险之间存在强烈的显著关联。然而,进一步的神经心理学研究需要分别分析单相和双相情感障碍,并研究性别差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验