Merkus Suzanne L, Holte Kari Anne, Huysmans Maaike A, van Mechelen Willem, van der Beek Allard J
Research group Work and Safety, International Research Institute of Stavanger, PO Box 8046, 4068, Stavanger, Norway.
Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 23;15:1084. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2407-9.
Theoretical models on shift work fall short of describing relevant health-related pathways associated with the broader concept of nonstandard working schedules. Shift work models neither combine relevant working time characteristics applicable to nonstandard schedules nor include the role of rest periods and recovery in the development of health complaints. Therefore, this paper aimed to develop a comprehensive model on nonstandard working schedules to address these shortcomings.
A literature review was conducted using a systematic search and selection process. Two searches were performed: one associating the working time characteristics time-of-day and working time duration with health and one associating recovery after work with health. Data extracted from the models were used to develop a comprehensive model on nonstandard working schedules and health.
For models on the working time characteristics, the search strategy yielded 3044 references, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria that contained 22 distinctive models. For models on recovery after work, the search strategy yielded 896 references, of which seven met the inclusion criteria containing seven distinctive models. Of the models on the working time characteristics, three combined time-of-day with working time duration, 18 were on time-of-day (i.e. shift work), and one was on working time duration. The model developed in the paper has a comprehensive approach to working hours and other work-related risk factors and proposes that they should be balanced by positive non-work factors to maintain health. Physiological processes leading to health complaints are circadian disruption, sleep deprivation, and activation that should be counterbalanced by (re-)entrainment, restorative sleep, and recovery, respectively, to maintain health.
A comprehensive model on nonstandard working schedules and health was developed. The model proposes that work and non-work as well as their associated physiological processes need to be balanced to maintain good health. The model gives researchers a useful overview over the various risk factors and pathways associated with health that should be considered when studying any form of nonstandard working schedule.
关于轮班工作的理论模型未能描述与非标准工作时间表这一更广泛概念相关的健康相关途径。轮班工作模型既没有整合适用于非标准时间表的相关工作时间特征,也没有纳入休息时间和恢复在健康问题发展中的作用。因此,本文旨在开发一个关于非标准工作时间表的综合模型,以解决这些不足。
采用系统的检索和筛选过程进行文献综述。进行了两次检索:一次将一天中的工作时间特征和工作时长与健康联系起来,另一次将下班后的恢复与健康联系起来。从这些模型中提取的数据用于开发一个关于非标准工作时间表与健康的综合模型。
对于关于工作时间特征的模型,检索策略产生了3044篇参考文献,其中26篇符合纳入标准,包含22个不同的模型。对于关于下班后恢复的模型,检索策略产生了896篇参考文献,其中7篇符合纳入标准,包含7个不同的模型。在关于工作时间特征的模型中,3个将一天中的时间与工作时长结合起来,18个是关于一天中的时间(即轮班工作),1个是关于工作时长。本文开发的模型对工作时间和其他与工作相关的风险因素采用了综合方法,并提出应通过积极的非工作因素来平衡这些因素以维持健康。导致健康问题的生理过程是昼夜节律紊乱、睡眠剥夺和激活,应分别通过(重新)同步、恢复性睡眠和恢复来平衡,以维持健康。
开发了一个关于非标准工作时间表与健康的综合模型。该模型提出,工作和非工作以及它们相关的生理过程需要保持平衡以维持良好健康。该模型为研究人员提供了一个有用的概述,涵盖了在研究任何形式的非标准工作时间表时应考虑的与健康相关的各种风险因素和途径。