Suppr超能文献

癌症手术中接受挥发性麻醉与静脉麻醉的患者的长期生存:回顾性分析。

Long-term Survival for Patients Undergoing Volatile versus IV Anesthesia for Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Unit (T.J.W., S.J.) and Research and Development Department (K.M.), Royal Marsden Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):69-79. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000936.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection remains the best option for long-term survival in many solid tumors. Surgery can, however, lead to tumor cell release into the circulation. Data have suggested differential effects of anesthetic agents on cancer cell growth. This retrospective analysis investigated the association of anesthetic technique with long-term survival in patients presenting for elective surgery in a comprehensive cancer center over 3 yr.

METHODS

All patients undergoing elective surgery between June 2010 and May 2013 were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they had received volatile inhalational (INHA) or total IV anesthesia (TIVA). After excluding those who received both forms of anesthesia during the study period, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed from the date of surgery to death. After propensity matching, univariate and multivariable regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death.

RESULTS

A total of 11,395 anesthetics using INHA or TIVA were delivered in the study period. After exclusions, 3,316 patients (796 deaths, 24%) remained in the INHA group and 3,714 (504 deaths, 13.5%) in the TIVA group. After propensity matching, 2,607 patients remained in each group (597 deaths, 22.8%, in INHA group vs. 407, 15.6%, in TIVA group). Volatile inhalational anesthesia was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.59 (1.30 to 1.95) for death on univariate analysis and 1.46 (1.29 to 1.66) after multivariable analysis of known confounders in the matched group.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis demonstrates an association between type of anesthetic delivered and survival. This analysis alongside biological plausibility should lead to urgent prospective work exploring the effect of anesthetic technique on survival.

摘要

背景

在许多实体肿瘤中,手术切除仍然是长期生存的最佳选择。然而,手术可能导致肿瘤细胞释放到循环中。数据表明,麻醉剂对癌细胞生长有不同的影响。本回顾性分析调查了在综合癌症中心 3 年内接受择期手术的患者中,麻醉技术与长期生存的关系。

方法

纳入 2010 年 6 月至 2013 年 5 月期间接受择期手术的所有患者。根据是否接受挥发性吸入麻醉(INHA)或全静脉麻醉(TIVA)将患者分组。在排除研究期间同时接受两种麻醉形式的患者后,从手术日期到死亡日期构建 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线。在进行倾向评分匹配后,使用单变量和多变量回归模型比较死亡的风险比。

结果

在研究期间共使用 INHA 或 TIVA 提供了 11395 次麻醉。排除后,3316 例患者(796 例死亡,24%)留在 INHA 组,3714 例(504 例死亡,13.5%)留在 TIVA 组。在倾向评分匹配后,每组仍有 2607 例患者(INHA 组 597 例死亡,22.8%,TIVA 组 407 例死亡,15.6%)。单变量分析显示,挥发性吸入麻醉与死亡风险比为 1.59(1.30 至 1.95),多变量分析校正匹配组中已知混杂因素后为 1.46(1.29 至 1.66)。

结论

本回顾性分析表明,所给予的麻醉类型与生存之间存在关联。这种分析以及生物学上的合理性应该导致迫切需要进行前瞻性研究,以探索麻醉技术对生存的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验