Franck Linél, Molyneux Natalie, Parkinson Lynne
Central Queensland University, Building 32, North Rockhampton, QLD, 4701, Australia.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1395-407. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1197-y. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
A systematic review was undertaken of studies reporting interventions for reducing social isolation and depression in older people receiving aged care services (community or residential).
Gray literature and relevant electronic databases were systematically searched for studies published in English between January 2009 and December 2013. Two reviewers independently screened studies for selection using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and independently completed methodological quality review at study level. Studies of poor methodological quality were excluded. Data were extracted at study level by one reviewer and independently checked by a second reviewer, using a standardized form. The results across studies were qualitatively synthesized with outcomes described and summarized at last follow-up.
Although the original objective was to review rural studies, no intervention studies based in rural areas met criteria for inclusion in the review, and only urban studies could be reviewed. Of 403 articles, six articles representing five studies with moderate-to-low risk of bias were included for review. All study participants were older adults ranging in age from 77 to 86 years. All studies had small sample sizes, ranging from 26 to 113 participants. Three of the five included intervention studies successfully reduced social isolation; one also successfully reduced depression.
Only one intervention, group-based reminiscence therapy, was reported as successful in reducing both social isolation and depression in older people within an urban aged care setting. More research is needed to explore transferability of interventions across different aged care settings and into rural areas.
对报告针对接受老年护理服务(社区或机构)的老年人减少社会隔离和抑郁的干预措施的研究进行系统评价。
系统检索灰色文献和相关电子数据库,查找2009年1月至2013年12月期间以英文发表的研究。两名评价者使用预先确定的纳入和排除标准独立筛选研究以进行选择,并在研究层面独立完成方法学质量评价。方法学质量差的研究被排除。由一名评价者在研究层面提取数据,并由另一名评价者使用标准化表格独立进行核对。对各研究结果进行定性综合,在末次随访时描述并总结结果。
尽管最初的目标是回顾农村地区的研究,但没有基于农村地区的干预研究符合纳入本评价的标准,因此只能回顾城市研究。在403篇文章中,纳入6篇文章,代表5项偏倚风险为中到低的研究进行评价。所有研究参与者均为77至86岁的老年人。所有研究的样本量都很小,参与者人数从26人到113人不等。五项纳入的干预研究中有三项成功减少了社会隔离;一项还成功减少了抑郁。
在城市老年护理环境中,只有一种干预措施,即基于小组的回忆疗法,被报告在减少老年人的社会隔离和抑郁方面取得了成功。需要更多研究来探索干预措施在不同老年护理环境中的可转移性以及在农村地区的适用性。