Kuipers A, Koops W J, Wemmenhove H
Expertise Centre for Farm Management and Knowledge Transfer, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 6706 KN Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Animal Production Systems, Wageningen University, 6708 WD Wageningen, the Netherlands.
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Feb;99(2):1632-1648. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8428. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
The aim of this study was to examine the variation in antibiotic use and the effects of external factors on trends in antibiotic use at the herd level by using the number of daily dosages as an indicator for antibiotic use. For this purpose, antibiotic use was analyzed in 94 dairy herds in the Netherlands from 2005 to 2012. The herds were divided into 3 groups of farmers: one group was guided in their antibiotic use from 2008 to 2010 as part of the project, whereas the other 2 groups were not actively guided. The farms were located in 10 of the 12 provinces and were clients of 32 of the 300 veterinary practices that treat cattle. Sales invoices from the veterinary practices provided the antibiotic and cost data for the participating farmers. The number of animal-defined daily dosages (ADDD) indicates the number of days per year that the average cow in a herd is given antibiotic treatment. The average ADDD for all farms from 2005 to 2012 was 5.86 (standard deviation=2.14); 68% of ADDD were used for udder health, 24% for clinical mastitis and 44% for dry-cow therapy. Variation in ADDD among herds decreased during the study period. The trend in ADDD can be described as having 3 phases: (1) a period of increasing use coinciding with little public concern about antibiotic use (2005-2007), (2) a period of growing awareness and stabilization of use (2007-2010), and (3) a period of decreasing use coinciding with increasing societal concerns (2010-2012). The greatest reduction in use was for drugs other than those used to treat the udder. Drug use for mastitis treatment fell considerably in the final year of the study period, whereas farmers were reluctant to reduce use for dry-cow therapy. Almost 40% of the herds were given less than 2.5 ADDD for dry-cow therapy, which is equivalent to 2.5 tubes per average cow in the herd, and 20% used more than 3 tubes per cow. Use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones dropped from 18% of ADDD during 2005 to 2010 to 1% in 2012, with a shift toward penicillins and broad spectrum drugs. The ADDD was 22% lower in 2012 than 2007, the year of the highest usage. The decrease in ADDD over time varied between the 3 groups of farmers. During the second phase of the study, the guided group began to display a reduction in use, whereas the other groups only displayed a significant reduction in the third phase. The reduction in antibiotic use has resulted in lower veterinary costs per cow in recent years.
本研究的目的是通过将每日剂量数作为抗生素使用的指标,来考察畜群水平上抗生素使用的变化情况以及外部因素对抗生素使用趋势的影响。为此,对荷兰94个奶牛场2005年至2012年期间的抗生素使用情况进行了分析。这些奶牛场被分为3组农户:其中一组在2008年至2010年作为项目的一部分,其抗生素使用受到指导,而另外两组未得到积极指导。这些农场分布在12个省份中的10个,是300家治疗牛的兽医诊所中32家的客户。兽医诊所的销售发票提供了参与农户的抗生素和成本数据。动物定义的每日剂量数(ADDD)表明畜群中平均每头奶牛每年接受抗生素治疗的天数。2005年至2012年所有农场的平均ADDD为5.86(标准差=2.14);68%的ADDD用于乳房健康,24%用于临床乳腺炎,44%用于干奶牛治疗。在研究期间,畜群间ADDD的差异有所减小。ADDD的趋势可描述为有三个阶段:(1)使用量增加的时期,这一时期公众对抗生素使用的关注较少(2005 - 2007年);(2)意识增强和使用量稳定的时期(2007 - 2010年);(3)使用量减少的时期,这一时期社会关注度不断提高(2010 - 2012年)。使用量减少最多的是用于治疗乳房以外疾病的药物。在研究期的最后一年,用于乳腺炎治疗的药物使用量大幅下降,而农户们不愿减少用于干奶牛治疗的药物使用量。近40%的畜群用于干奶牛治疗的ADDD低于2.5,这相当于畜群中平均每头奶牛2.5管,20%的畜群每头牛使用量超过3管。第三代和第四代头孢菌素以及氟喹诺酮类药物的使用量从2005年至2010年期间占ADDD的18%降至2012年的1%,用药转向了青霉素和广谱药物。2012年的ADDD比使用量最高的2007年低22%。随着时间推移,三组农户的ADDD下降情况各不相同。在研究的第二阶段,受指导组开始出现使用量下降,而其他组仅在第三阶段出现显著下降。近年来,抗生素使用量的减少使每头牛的兽医成本降低。