Han Doug Hyun, Lee Jung Jae, Moon Duk-Soo, Cha Myoung-Jin, Kim Min A, Min Seonyeong, Yang Ji Hoon, Lee Eun Jeong, Yoo Seo Koo, Chung Un-Sun
Department of Psychiatry, Chung Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jan;31(1):114-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.1.114. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
We aimed to validate the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG)-Korean version among 1,138 Korean adolescents, representing a response rate of 57% of 1,997 students. Participants completed a set of questionnaires including demographic variables (age, sex, years of education, experience of grief), the ICG, the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and the Lifetime Incidence of Traumatic Events-Child (LITE-C). Exploratory factor analysis was performed to determine whether the ICG items indicated complicated grief in Korean adolescents. The internal consistency of the ICG-Korean version was Cronbach's α=0.87. The test-retest reliability for a randomly selected sample of 314 participants in 2 weeks was r=0.75 (P<0.001). Concurrent validity was assessed using a correlation between the ICG total scores and the CDI total scores (r=0.75, P<0.001). The criterion-related validity based on the comparison of ICG total scores between adolescents without complicated grief (1.2 ± 3.7) and adolescent with complicated grief (3.2 ± 6.6) groups was relatively high (t=5.71, P<0.001). The data acquired from the 1,138 students was acceptable for a factor analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy=0.911; Bartlett's Test of Sphericity, χ(2)=13,144.7, P<0.001). After omission of 3 items, the value of Cronbach's α increased from 0.87 for the 19-item ICG-Korean version to 0.93 for the 16-item ICG-Korean version. These results suggest that the ICG is a useful tool in assessing for complicated grief in Korean adolescents. However, the 16-item version of the ICG appeared to be more valid compared to the 19-item version of the ICG. We suggest that the 16-item version of the ICG be used to screen for complicated grief in Korean adolescents.
我们旨在对1138名韩国青少年进行《复杂悲伤量表》(ICG)韩语版的效度验证,这代表了1997名学生中57%的回复率。参与者完成了一系列问卷,包括人口统计学变量(年龄、性别、受教育年限、悲伤经历)、ICG、儿童抑郁量表(CDI)和儿童创伤事件终身发生率量表(LITE-C)。进行探索性因素分析以确定ICG项目是否表明韩国青少年存在复杂悲伤。ICG韩语版的内部一致性为Cronbach's α = 0.87。对随机抽取的314名参与者在2周内进行重测,重测信度为r = 0.75(P < 0.001)。通过ICG总分与CDI总分之间的相关性评估同时效度(r = 0.75,P < 0.001)。基于无复杂悲伤青少年组(1.2 ± 3.7)和有复杂悲伤青少年组(3.2 ± 6.6)之间ICG总分比较的标准关联效度相对较高(t = 5.71,P < 0.001)。从1138名学生获得的数据对于因素分析是可接受的(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin抽样适当性度量 = 0.911;Bartlett球形检验,χ(2)=13144.7,P < 0.001)。在删除3个项目后,Cronbach's α的值从19项ICG韩语版的0.87增加到16项ICG韩语版的0.93。这些结果表明ICG是评估韩国青少年复杂悲伤的有用工具。然而,与19项版的ICG相比,16项版的ICG似乎更有效。我们建议使用16项版的ICG来筛查韩国青少年的复杂悲伤。