Vitaliano P P, Russo J, Carr J E, Maiuro R D, Becker J
Multivariate Behav Res. 1985 Jan 1;20(1):3-26. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2001_1.
This study examined the psychometric properties of the "original" seven factored scales derived by Aldwin et al. from Folkman and Lazarus' Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL) versus a revised set of scales. Four psychometric properties were examined including the reproducibility of the factor structure of the original scales, the internal consistency reliabilities and intercorrelations of the original and the revised scales, the construct and concurrent validity of the scales, and their relationships to demographic factors. These properties were studied on three distressed samples: 83 psychiatric outpatients, 62 spouses of patients with Alzheimer's disease, and 425 medical students. The revised scales were consistently shown to be more reliable and to share substantially less variance than the original scales across all samples. In terms of construct validity, depression was positively related to the revised Wishful Thinking Scale and negatively related to the revised Problem-Focused Scale consistently across samples. Anxiety was also related to these scales, and in addition, it was positively related to the Seeks Social Support Scale across samples. The Mixed Scale was the only original scale that was consistently related to depression and anxiety across the three samples. Evidence for concurrent validity was provided by the fact that medical students in group therapy had significantly higher original and revised scale scores than students not participating in such groups. Both sets of scales were shown to be generally free of demographic biases.
本研究考察了阿尔德温等人从福克曼和拉扎勒斯的应对方式清单(WCCL)中得出的“原始”七因素量表与一组修订量表的心理测量特性。研究了四个心理测量特性,包括原始量表因子结构的可重复性、原始量表与修订量表的内部一致性信度和相互关系、量表的结构效度和同时效度,以及它们与人口统计学因素的关系。在三个受困扰的样本上研究了这些特性:83名精神科门诊患者、62名阿尔茨海默病患者的配偶以及425名医学生。在所有样本中,修订后的量表始终显示出比原始量表更可靠,且共享的方差显著更小。在结构效度方面,抑郁在各样本中始终与修订后的如意算盘量表呈正相关,与修订后的问题聚焦量表呈负相关。焦虑也与这些量表相关,此外,在各样本中焦虑与寻求社会支持量表呈正相关。混合量表是在三个样本中始终与抑郁和焦虑相关的唯一原始量表。团体治疗中的医学生的原始量表和修订量表得分显著高于未参加此类团体的学生,这一事实为同时效度提供了证据。两组量表总体上均未显示出人口统计学偏差。