Wiley Henry E, Thompson Darby J S, Bailey Clare, Chew Emily Y, Cukras Catherine A, Jaffe Glenn J, Lee Richard W J, Loken Erin K, Meyerle Catherine B, Wong Wai, Ferris Frederick L
National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, Maryland.
Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):841-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.021. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
To investigate the comparative efficacy of bevacizumab (Avastin) and ranibizumab (Lucentis; both Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) using a crossover study design.
Randomized, double-masked, 36-week, 3-period crossover clinical trial.
Fifty-six subjects with DME involving the center of the macula in one or both eyes.
Monthly intravitreous injections of bevacizumab (1.25 mg) or ranibizumab (0.3 mg).
Comparison of mean changes in visual acuity and central retinal thickness, tested using a linear mixed-effects model.
Based on the linear mixed-effects model, the 3-month estimated mean improvement in visual acuity was 5.3 letters for bevacizumab and 6.6 letters for ranibizumab (difference, 1.3 letters; P = 0.039). Estimated change in optical coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield mean thickness (CSMT) was -89 μm for bevacizumab and -137 μm for ranibizumab (difference, 48 μm; P < 0.001). Incorporating cumulative treatment benefit, the model yielded a predicted 36-week (9-month) average improvement in visual acuity of 7.1 letters (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-9.2) for bevacizumab and 8.4 letters (95% CI, 6.3-10.5) for ranibizumab, and a change in OCT CSMT of -128 μm (95% CI, -155 to -100) for bevacizumab and -176 μm (95% CI, -202 to -149) for ranibizumab. There was no significant treatment-by-period interaction (i.e., treatment difference was constant in all 3 periods), nor was there a significant differential carryover effect from one period to the next.
This trial demonstrated a statistically significant but small relative clinical benefit of ranibizumab compared with bevacizumab for treatment of DME, using a markedly reduced sample size relative to a full comparative efficacy study. The effects on visual acuity and central retinal thickness for the 2 drugs are consistent with those reported at 1 year for the concurrent parallel-group trial by the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network testing bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept for DME. The 3-period crossover design allowed for meaningful and efficient comparison, suggesting that this approach may be useful for future comparative efficacy studies of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for DME.
采用交叉研究设计,探讨贝伐单抗(阿瓦斯汀)和雷珠单抗( Lucentis;均由加利福尼亚州南旧金山的基因泰克公司生产)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的相对疗效。
随机、双盲、为期36周的3阶段交叉临床试验。
56例一只眼或双眼黄斑中心凹受累的DME患者。
每月玻璃体腔内注射贝伐单抗(1.25mg)或雷珠单抗(0.3mg)。
采用线性混合效应模型测试视力和视网膜中央厚度的平均变化并进行比较。
基于线性混合效应模型,3个月时贝伐单抗组视力的估计平均改善为5.3个字母,雷珠单抗组为6.6个字母(差异为1.3个字母;P = 0.039)。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)中央子野平均厚度(CSMT)的估计变化,贝伐单抗组为-89μm,雷珠单抗组为-137μm(差异为48μm;P < 0.001)。纳入累积治疗益处后,该模型预测贝伐单抗组36周(9个月)的平均视力改善为7.1个字母(95%置信区间[CI],5.0 - 9.2),雷珠单抗组为8.4个字母(95%CI,6.3 - 10.5);OCT CSMT的变化,贝伐单抗组为-128μm(95%CI,-155至-100),雷珠单抗组为-176μm(95%CI,-202至-149)。治疗阶段之间无显著交互作用(即所有3个阶段的治疗差异均恒定),从一个阶段到下一个阶段也无显著的差异延续效应。
本试验表明,与贝伐单抗相比,雷珠单抗治疗DME在统计学上有显著但相对较小的临床益处,与全面的比较疗效研究相比,样本量显著减少。两种药物对视力和视网膜中央厚度的影响与糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究网络针对DME同时进行的平行组试验中报告的1年结果一致。3阶段交叉设计允许进行有意义且高效的比较,表明该方法可能对未来抗血管内皮生长因子药物治疗DME的比较疗效研究有用。