Allom Vanessa, Mullan Barbara, Cowie Eloise, Hamilton Kyra
Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine Research Group, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Australia.
Menzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Australia.
Am J Health Behav. 2016 Mar;40(2):280-90. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.2.13.
First generation students transitioning to college experience specific challenges that impact on their engagement in physical activity. Furthermore, this population experiences a context disruption that provides a unique opportunity to examine whether intention and habit predict physical activity. The aim of the current research was to determine the efficacy of the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of intention and behavior within this population, and to determine whether habit contributes to the prediction of physical activity.
In this observational study, a convenience sample of first generation college students (N = 101) completed measures of theory of planned behavior variables and habit strength at Time 1, and one week later reported physical activity.
The theory of planned behavior was partially supported in this context, as intention was the only significant predictor of behavior. Habit strength accounted for additional variance in physical activity but did not moderate the relationship between intention and behavior. The hypothesized model accounted for 46.9% of the variance in physical activity, and intention (β = .455) and habit (β = .364) were significant predictors.
Intention and habit exert independent effects on physical activity within this population, and are both suitable targets for intervention.
第一代大学生向大学过渡时会遇到特定挑战,这些挑战会影响他们参与体育活动的情况。此外,这一群体经历了环境干扰,这为研究意图和习惯是否能预测体育活动提供了独特机会。本研究的目的是确定计划行为理论在预测这一群体的意图和行为方面的有效性,并确定习惯是否有助于预测体育活动。
在这项观察性研究中,对第一代大学生(N = 101)进行便利抽样,他们在时间1完成了计划行为理论变量和习惯强度的测量,并在一周后报告了体育活动情况。
在这种情况下,计划行为理论得到了部分支持,因为意图是行为的唯一显著预测因素。习惯强度解释了体育活动中的额外方差,但并未调节意图与行为之间的关系。假设模型解释了体育活动中方差的46.9%,意图(β = .455)和习惯(β = .364)是显著的预测因素。
意图和习惯对这一群体的体育活动产生独立影响,且都是合适的干预目标。