Suppr超能文献

使用沃纳-布拉茨勒剪切力和质地剖面分析测量法评估猪里脊肉的感官嫩度

Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements.

作者信息

Choe Jee-Hwan, Choi Mi-Hee, Rhee Min-Suk, Kim Byoung-Chul

机构信息

Division of Food Bioscience and Technology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea.

出版信息

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016 Jul;29(7):1029-36. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0482. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

Abstract

This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, initial tenderness, chewiness, and rate of breakdown. In a regression analysis, WBS could account variations in these sensory variables, though only to a limited proportion of variation. On the other hand, three parameters from texture profile analysis (TPA)-hardness, gumminess, and chewiness-were significantly correlated with all sensory evaluation variables. In particular, from the result of stepwise regression analysis, TPA hardness alone explained over 15% of variation in all sensory evaluation variables, with the exception of perceptible residue. Based on these results, TPA analysis was found to be better than WBS measurement, with the TPA parameter hardness likely to prove particularly useful, in terms of predicting pork loin tenderness as rated by trained panelists. However, sensory evaluation should be conducted to investigate practical pork tenderness perceived by consumer, because both instrumental measurements could explain only a small portion (less than 20%) of the variability in sensory evaluation.

摘要

本研究调查了仪器测量在多大程度上能够解释经训练的评估小组成员通过感官评价得出的猪里脊肉嫩度的变化情况。沃纳-布拉茨勒剪切力(WBS)与感官嫩度变量(如柔软度、初始嫩度、咀嚼性和分解速率)之间存在显著关系。在回归分析中,WBS能够解释这些感官变量的变化,不过仅占变化的有限比例。另一方面,质地剖面分析(TPA)的三个参数——硬度、黏性和咀嚼性——与所有感官评价变量都显著相关。特别是,从逐步回归分析的结果来看,仅TPA硬度就解释了除可察觉残渣外所有感官评价变量中超过15%的变化。基于这些结果,发现TPA分析比WBS测量更优,就预测经训练的评估小组成员评定的猪里脊肉嫩度而言,TPA参数硬度可能被证明特别有用。然而,应该进行感官评价以调查消费者实际感知到的猪肉嫩度,因为两种仪器测量都只能解释感官评价中一小部分(不到20%)的变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe43/4932580/08c72216dd49/ajas-29-7-1029f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验