Suppr超能文献

不停用单药或双药抗血小板治疗进行拔牙:一项回顾性队列研究的结果

Dental extraction without stopping single or dual antiplatelet therapy: results of a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Lu S-Y, Tsai C-Y, Lin L-H, Lu S-N

机构信息

Oral Pathology and Family Dentistry Section, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Oral Pathology and Family Dentistry Section, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;45(10):1293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of bleeding after dental extraction without stopping antiplatelet therapy. Postoperative bleeding was assessed in a total of 1271 patients who were divided into two groups: a study group comprising 183 patients on antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 125 patients/185 occasions; clopidogrel 42 patients/65 occasions; dual therapy 16 patients/24 occasions) who underwent 548 dental extractions on 274 occasions, and a control group comprising 1088 patients who were not receiving any antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy and underwent 2487 dental extractions on 1472 occasions. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was higher in the study group (5/274, 1.8%) than in the control group (10/1472, 0.7%), and also in the dual antiplatelet subgroup (1/24, 4.2%) than in the single antiplatelet subgroups (clopidogrel: 2/65, 3.1%; aspirin: 2/185, 1.1%); however, these differences were not significant. Postoperative bleeding was managed successfully by repacking with Gelfoam impregnated with tranexamic acid powder in 12 patients and by resuturing in three of the control patients undergoing extraction of impacted teeth with flap elevation. These findings indicate that there is no need to interrupt antiplatelet drugs before dental extraction.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查在不停用抗血小板治疗的情况下拔牙后出血的发生率。对总共1271例患者的术后出血情况进行了评估,这些患者被分为两组:研究组包括183例接受抗血小板治疗的患者(阿司匹林125例患者/185次;氯吡格雷42例患者/65次;双联治疗16例患者/24次),他们在274个不同场合接受了548次拔牙;对照组包括1088例未接受任何抗血小板或抗凝治疗的患者,他们在1472个不同场合接受了2487次拔牙。研究组的术后出血发生率(5/274,1.8%)高于对照组(10/1472,0.7%),双联抗血小板亚组(1/24,4.2%)的术后出血发生率也高于单药抗血小板亚组(氯吡格雷:2/65,3.1%;阿司匹林:2/185,1.1%);然而,这些差异并不显著。12例患者通过用浸有氨甲环酸粉末的明胶海绵重新填塞成功处理了术后出血,3例接受翻瓣拔除阻生牙的对照组患者通过再次缝合成功处理了术后出血。这些发现表明拔牙前无需中断抗血小板药物治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验