Slutske Wendy S, Deutsch Arielle R, Piasecki Thomas M
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 May;40(5):1010-9. doi: 10.1111/acer.13033. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
There is considerable variation in alcohol use and problems across the United States, suggesting that systematic regional differences might contribute to alcohol involvement. Several neighborhood contextual factors may be important aspects of this "alcohol environment."
Participants were 15,197 young adults (age 18 to 26) from Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, a nationally representative U.S. survey. Measures of past-year alcohol use and problems were obtained via structured in-home interviews. Tract-level neighborhood contextual factors (density of on- and off-premises alcohol outlets, neighborhood disadvantage, rural vs. urban residence) were derived from census indicators and geocoded state-level alcohol outlet licenses. Multivariate logistic regression, ordered logistic regression, or negative binomial regression models, including age, sex, race, and household income as covariates, were fit to examine the relation of the neighborhood contextual factors with alcohol use and problems.
The most consistent finding across 4 of the 5 measures of alcohol involvement was their association with neighborhood advantage; the active ingredient underlying this effect was primarily the proportion of educated residents in the neighborhood. The densities of alcohol outlets were associated with any alcohol use-they were not associated with binge drinking or alcohol problems, nor could they explain any of the neighborhood advantage effects. The influence of alcohol outlet densities on alcohol involvement did not differ for those above or below the legal age to purchase alcohol. Living in a rural versus an urban neighborhood was associated with a different alcohol use pattern characterized by a lower likelihood of any drinking, but among those who drank, consuming more alcohol per occasion.
Living in a more advantaged and educated urban neighborhood with greater densities of bars and restaurants is associated with greater alcohol involvement among 18- to 26-year-olds in the United States.
美国各地的酒精使用情况和相关问题存在很大差异,这表明系统性的地区差异可能导致酒精相关问题。几个社区环境因素可能是这种“酒精环境”的重要方面。
参与者为来自美国全国青少年健康纵向研究第三波的15197名年轻人(年龄在18至26岁之间),该研究是一项具有全国代表性的美国调查。过去一年的酒精使用情况和相关问题通过结构化的入户访谈获得。社区层面的环境因素(有酒牌和无酒牌的酒精销售点密度、社区劣势、农村与城市居住情况)来自人口普查指标和地理编码的州级酒精销售点许可证。多元逻辑回归、有序逻辑回归或负二项回归模型,包括年龄、性别、种族和家庭收入作为协变量,用于检验社区环境因素与酒精使用及相关问题之间的关系。
在五项酒精相关指标中的四项上,最一致的发现是它们与社区优势相关;这种影响的关键因素主要是社区中受过教育居民的比例。酒精销售点的密度与任何酒精使用相关——它们与暴饮或酒精问题无关,也无法解释任何社区优势效应。酒精销售点密度对酒精相关问题的影响在法定饮酒年龄以上和以下的人群中没有差异。生活在农村与城市社区与不同的酒精使用模式相关,其特点是饮酒的可能性较低,但在饮酒者中,每次饮酒量较多。
在美国,生活在一个更具优势、居民受教育程度更高且酒吧和餐馆密度更大的城市社区与18至26岁人群中更高的酒精相关问题有关。