Pohl-Dernick Katharina, Meier Florian, Maas Renke, Schöffski Oliver, Emmert Martin
Chair of Health Management, Institute of Management (IFM), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany.
Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Fahrstr. 17, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 1;16:109. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1366-x.
Several lists of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) for elderly patients have been developed worldwide in recent years. Those lists intend to reduce prescriptions of drugs that carry an unnecessarily high risk of adverse drug events in elderly patients. In 2010, an expert panel published the PRISCUS list for the German drug market. This study calculates the amount of drug reimbursement for PIM in Germany and potential cost effects from the perspective of statutory health insurance when these are replaced by the substitutes recommended by the PRISCUS list.
Register-based data for the 30 top-selling drugs on the PRISCUS list in 2009 for patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age were provided by the Scientific Institute of the German Local Health Care Fund. We calculated the percentage of sales and defined daily doses for patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age compared with the total statutory health insurance population. Reimbursement costs for the recommended substitutions were estimated by considering different scenarios.
In 2009, drug reimbursement for the 30 top-selling PIM prescribed to patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age were calculated to be €305.7 million. Prescribing the recommended substitution medication instead of PIM would lead to an increased total reimbursement cost for the German health care system ranging between from €325.9 million to €810.0 million.
The results show that the substitution of PIM by medication deemed to be more appropriate for the elderly comes along with additional costs. Consequently, there is no short-term incentive for doing so from a payer perspective. Future studies have to consider the long-term effects and other sectors.
近年来,全球已制定了多份针对老年患者的潜在不适当用药(PIM)清单。这些清单旨在减少给老年患者开具的、具有不必要高不良药物事件风险的药物处方。2010年,一个专家小组发布了适用于德国药品市场的PRISCUS清单。本研究计算了德国PIM的药物报销金额,以及从法定医疗保险的角度来看,当这些药物被PRISCUS清单推荐的替代药物取代时的潜在成本影响。
德国地方医疗保健基金科学研究所提供了2009年PRISCUS清单上30种最畅销药物的基于登记的数据,这些数据针对年龄大于或等于65岁的患者。我们计算了年龄大于或等于65岁患者的销售额百分比和限定日剂量,并与法定医疗保险总人群进行了比较。通过考虑不同情景来估计推荐替代药物的报销成本。
2009年,给年龄大于或等于65岁患者开具的30种最畅销PIM的药物报销金额经计算为3.057亿欧元。开具推荐的替代药物而非PIM将导致德国医疗保健系统的总报销成本增加,增加幅度在3.259亿欧元至8.100亿欧元之间。
结果表明,用被认为更适合老年人的药物替代PIM会带来额外成本。因此,从支付方的角度来看,短期内没有这样做的激励因素。未来的研究必须考虑长期影响和其他部门。