Suppr超能文献

219例慢性下腰痛患者额状面和矢状面三维脊柱运动参数的可靠性及测量误差

Reliability and measurement error of frontal and horizontal 3D spinal motion parameters in 219 patients with chronic low back pain.

作者信息

Harsted Steen, Mieritz Rune M, Bronfort Gert, Hartvigsen Jan

机构信息

Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, DK-5230 Denmark.

Integrative Health & Wellbeing Research Program, Center for Spirituality & Healing, Academic Health Center, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC-505, 612-301-9005 Room B296-1, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA ; Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, DK-5230 Denmark.

出版信息

Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Apr 4;24:13. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0092-0. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order for measurements to be clinically useful, data on psychometric conditions such as reliability should be available in the population for which the measurements are intended to be used. This study comprises a test-retest design separated by 7 to 14 days, and evaluates the intra and interrater reliability of regional frontal and horizontal spinal motion in 219 chronic LBP patients using the CA6000 Spine Motion Analyzer. In addition, it compares these results on the frontal and horizontal plane with previously published results on the sagittal plane. 219 individuals with chronic mechanical LBP, classified as either Quebec Task Force group 1, 2, 3 or 4 were included, and kinematics of the lumbar spine were sampled during standardized spinal lateral flexion and rotation motion using a 6-df instrumented spatial linkage system. Test-retest reliability and measurement error were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients ICC(1,1) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOAs).

RESULTS

The reliability analysis based on the whole study sample showed ICC(1,1) coefficients varying between 0.68 and 0.73 for the frontal plane and 0.33 and 0.49 for the horizontal plane. Relatively wide LOAs were observed for all parameters. Reliability measures in patient subgroups ICC(1,1) ranged between 0.55 and 0.81 for the frontal plane and 0.28 and 0.69 for the horizontal plane. Greater ICC(1,1) coefficients and smaller LOA were observed when patients were examined by the same examiner, had a stable pain level between tests, and were male. ROM measurements were more reliable in patients with a BMI higher than 30, and measurements on patients with LBP and leg pain showed higher reliability and smaller measurement error in all parameters except for the jerk index.

CONCLUSION

Frontal plane measurements obtained using the CA6000 Spine Motion Analyzer are sufficiently reliable to be used for group comparisons but not individual comparisons. Measurements in the horizontal plane can be used for neither group nor individual comparisons.

摘要

背景

为使测量结果具有临床实用性,针对测量预期应用人群,应具备诸如可靠性等心理测量条件的数据。本研究采用间隔7至14天的重测设计,使用CA6000脊柱运动分析仪评估219例慢性腰痛患者区域额叶和水平脊柱运动的组内及组间评分者可靠性。此外,将额面和水平面的这些结果与先前发表的矢状面结果进行比较。纳入219例慢性机械性腰痛患者,根据魁北克工作组分类为1、2、3或4组,使用6自由度仪器化空间连杆系统在标准化脊柱侧屈和旋转运动期间对腰椎运动学进行采样。使用组内相关系数ICC(1,1)和布兰德 - 奥特曼一致性界限(LOA)评估重测可靠性和测量误差。

结果

基于整个研究样本的可靠性分析显示,额面的ICC(1,1)系数在0.68至0.73之间,水平面的ICC(1,1)系数在0.33至0.49之间。所有参数均观察到相对较宽的LOA。患者亚组的可靠性测量ICC(1,1),额面在0.55至0.81之间,水平面在0.28至0.69之间。当由同一位检查者检查患者、测试期间疼痛水平稳定且为男性时,观察到更高的ICC(1,1)系数和更小的LOA。体重指数高于30的患者的ROM测量更可靠,并且对伴有腰痛和腿痛患者的测量在除急动指数外的所有参数中显示出更高的可靠性和更小的测量误差。

结论

使用CA6000脊柱运动分析仪获得的额面测量结果足够可靠,可用于组间比较,但不适用于个体比较。水平面测量结果既不能用于组间比较也不能用于个体比较。

相似文献

1
3
Test-retest reliability of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit analysis in people with and without chronic non-specific low back pain.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Jun;35:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
4
Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Spine J. 2012 Oct;12(10):960-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.175. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
5
Reliability of computer-assisted lumbar intervertebral measurements using a novel vertebral motion analysis system.
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.048. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
7
Reproducibility of lumbar spine range of motion measurements using the back range of motion device.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999 Aug;29(8):470-7. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1999.29.8.470.
8
Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Dec;86(12):2347-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.304.
9
Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1435-46. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067085.46840.5A.
10
Interrater reliability of a movement impairment-based classification system for lumbar spine syndromes in patients with chronic low back pain.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jun;38(6):371-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2760. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Computer-aided combined movement examination of the lumbar spine and manual therapy implications: Case report.
Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 30.
4
Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jul 10;15:229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-229.
5
Lumbar motion changes in chronic low back pain patients: a secondary analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial.
Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2618-27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
6
Intertester agreement and validity of identifying lumbar pain provocative movement patterns using active and passive accessory movement tests.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Feb;37(2):105-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.09.006. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
8
Reliability and measurement error of 3-dimensional regional lumbar motion measures: a systematic review.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Oct;35(8):645-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.09.011.
10
Supervised exercise, spinal manipulation, and home exercise for chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.
Spine J. 2011 Jul;11(7):585-98. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.036. Epub 2011 May 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验