Suppr超能文献

输尿管再植手术的硬膜外穿刺高度;位置重要吗?

Epidural insertion height for ureteric reimplant surgery; does location matter?

作者信息

Sommerfield David, Ramgolam Anoop, Barker Andrew, Bergesio Ric, von Ungern-Sternberg Britta S

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, WA, Australia.

Paediatric Respiratory Physiology, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Oct;26(10):951-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12895. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of vesicoureteric reflux through ureteric reimplantation is a common, highly successful treatment. Postoperative pain can be severe and may relate to somatic wound pain from the lower abdominal incision or from visceral bladder spasm pain.

AIM

To conduct a prospective quality improvement audit to compare four perioperative analgesic techniques.

METHODS

Observational data were collected on 217 patients following open ureteroneocystostomy over 5 days. The patients were split into four groups: (i) 'morphine' infusion; (ii) 'caudal'-single-shot caudal; (iii) 'epidural'-epidural catheter inserted at T10-L2 given a bolus, followed by an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 μg·ml(-1) ; (iv) 'caudal catheter'-caudal placed epidural catheter was treated similar to the epidural catheter. Data regarding postoperative analgesic interventions were recorded. Intravesical pethidine was used for bladder spasm pain and i.v. morphine for wound pain.

RESULTS

Over the study period, the caudal catheter technique (mean interventions/patient = 1.8 ± 2.6) and the single-shot caudal (6.1 ± 4) needed significantly less bladder spasm interventions than morphine (9.2 ± 4) and epidural (8.0 ± 4.4) patients. For wound pain, the caudal catheter (8.8 ± 3.3) and epidural groups (11.4 ± 3.2) needed significantly less interventions than morphine (16.1 ± 3) and caudal (15.3 ± 3.3) patients. Overall, caudal catheter patients on average required about half the number of pain interventions and were associated with less high nursing workload.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some limitations in data collection and study design, the caudal catheter technique was superior at reducing pain interventions, particularly bladder spasm interventions. Overall epidural analgesia was not superior to a single-shot caudal followed by opioid infusion. The issue of bladder spasm may be similar to the phenomenon of sacral sparing in obstetric epidural anesthesia. Thus, regional techniques, such as caudal epidural, targeting a better balance between sacral and lumber nerves are required.

摘要

背景

通过输尿管再植术对膀胱输尿管反流进行手术矫正,是一种常见且成功率很高的治疗方法。术后疼痛可能很严重,可能与下腹部切口的躯体伤口疼痛或膀胱内脏痉挛疼痛有关。

目的

进行一项前瞻性质量改进审核,以比较四种围手术期镇痛技术。

方法

收集了217例患者在开放性输尿管膀胱吻合术后5天的观察数据。患者被分为四组:(i)“吗啡”输注;(ii)“骶管阻滞”-单次骶管阻滞;(iii)“硬膜外麻醉”-在T10-L2插入硬膜外导管,给予一次推注,随后输注含2μg·ml⁻¹芬太尼的0.125%布比卡因;(iv)“骶管导管”-骶管放置的硬膜外导管的处理与硬膜外导管相似。记录有关术后镇痛干预的数据。膀胱内使用哌替啶治疗膀胱痉挛疼痛,静脉注射吗啡治疗伤口疼痛。

结果

在研究期间,骶管导管技术组(平均干预次数/患者 = 1.8±2.6)和单次骶管阻滞组(6.1±4)相比吗啡组(9.2±4)和硬膜外麻醉组(8.0±4.4)患者,膀胱痉挛干预次数明显更少。对于伤口疼痛,骶管导管组(8.8±3.3)和硬膜外麻醉组(11.4±3.2)相比吗啡组(16.1±3)和骶管阻滞组(15.3±3.3)患者,干预次数明显更少。总体而言,骶管导管组患者平均所需的疼痛干预次数约为一半,且护理工作量较小。

结论

尽管在数据收集和研究设计上存在一些局限性,但骶管导管技术在减少疼痛干预方面更具优势,尤其是膀胱痉挛干预。总体而言,硬膜外镇痛并不优于单次骶管阻滞加阿片类药物输注。膀胱痉挛问题可能类似于产科硬膜外麻醉中的骶部保留现象。因此,需要采用区域技术,如骶管硬膜外麻醉,以在骶神经和腰神经之间实现更好的平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验