Suppr超能文献

自闭症谱系障碍中的语篇理解:工作记忆负荷和共同基础的影响。

Discourse comprehension in autism spectrum disorder: Effects of working memory load and common ground.

机构信息

Division of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology-FWC, Medical College of Wisconsin 9200 West Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Road, U-1020, Storrs, Connecticut.

出版信息

Autism Res. 2016 Dec;9(12):1340-1352. doi: 10.1002/aur.1632. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

Abstract

Pragmatic language impairments are nearly universal in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Discourse requires that we monitor information that is shared or mutually known, called "common ground." While many studies have examined the role of Theory of Mind (ToM) in such impairments, few have examined working memory (WM). Common ground impairments in ASD could reflect limitations in both WM and ToM. This study explored common ground use in youth ages 8-17 years with high-functioning ASD (n = 13) and typical development (n = 22); groups did not differ on age, gender, IQ, or standardized language. We tracked participants' eye movements while they performed a discourse task in which some information was known only to the participant (e.g., was privileged; a manipulation of ToM). In addition, the amount of privileged information varied (a manipulation of WM). All participants were slower to fixate the target when considering privileged information, and this effect was greatest during high WM load trials. Further, the ASD group was more likely to fixate competing (non-target) shapes. Predictors of fixation patterns included ASD symptomatology, language ability, ToM, and WM. Groups did not differ in ToM. Individuals with better WM fixated the target more rapidly, suggesting an association between WM capacity and efficient discourse. In addition to ToM knowledge, WM capacity constrains common ground representation and impacts pragmatic skills in ASD. Social impairments in ASD are thus associated with WM capacity, such that deficits in domain-general, nonsocial processes such as WM exert an influence during complex social interactions. Autism Res 2016, 9: 1340-1352. © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

语用语言障碍在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中几乎普遍存在。语篇要求我们监控共享或相互了解的信息,称为“共同基础”。虽然许多研究已经研究了心理理论(ToM)在这些障碍中的作用,但很少有研究研究工作记忆(WM)。ASD 中的共同基础障碍可能反映了 WM 和 ToM 的局限性。本研究探讨了年龄在 8-17 岁的高功能 ASD 青少年(n = 13)和典型发育青少年(n = 22)的共同基础使用情况;两组在年龄、性别、智商或标准化语言方面没有差异。我们在参与者执行话语任务时跟踪他们的眼球运动,在该任务中,一些信息仅为参与者所知(例如,是特权信息;这是 ToM 的一种操作)。此外,特权信息的数量也有所不同(这是 WM 的一种操作)。当考虑特权信息时,所有参与者的注视目标速度都较慢,而在高 WM 负载试验中,这种效果最大。此外,ASD 组更有可能注视竞争(非目标)形状。注视模式的预测因子包括 ASD 症状、语言能力、ToM 和 WM。两组在 ToM 方面没有差异。WM 较好的个体更快地注视目标,这表明 WM 能力与有效的话语之间存在关联。除了 ToM 知识外,WM 能力还限制了共同基础的表示,并且对 ASD 中的语用技能产生影响。因此,ASD 中的社交障碍与 WM 能力有关,例如,像 WM 这样的非社交、非特定领域的过程的缺陷会在复杂的社交互动中产生影响。自闭症研究 2016,9:1340-1352。©2016 国际自闭症研究协会,威利期刊,公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验