University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lancet. 2016 Jun 18;387(10037):2507-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30272-0. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
Substantial concerns have been raised about the neuropsychiatric safety of the smoking cessation medications varenicline and bupropion. Their efficacy relative to nicotine patch largely relies on indirect comparisons, and there is limited information on safety and efficacy in smokers with psychiatric disorders. We compared the relative neuropsychiatric safety risk and efficacy of varenicline and bupropion with nicotine patch and placebo in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders.
We did a randomised, double-blind, triple-dummy, placebo-controlled and active-controlled (nicotine patch; 21 mg per day with taper) trial of varenicline (1 mg twice a day) and bupropion (150 mg twice a day) for 12 weeks with 12-week non-treatment follow-up done at 140 centres (clinical trial centres, academic centres, and outpatient clinics) in 16 countries between Nov 30, 2011, and Jan 13, 2015. Participants were motivated-to-quit smokers with and without psychiatric disorders who received brief cessation counselling at each visit. Randomisation was computer generated (1:1:1:1 ratio). Participants, investigators, and research personnel were masked to treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was the incidence of a composite measure of moderate and severe neuropsychiatric adverse events. The main efficacy endpoint was biochemically confirmed continuous abstinence for weeks 9-12. All participants randomly assigned were included in the efficacy analysis and those who received treatment were included in the safety analysis. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01456936) and is now closed.
8144 participants were randomly assigned, 4116 to the psychiatric cohort (4074 included in the safety analysis) and 4028 to the non-psychiatric cohort (3984 included in the safety analysis). In the non-psychiatric cohort, 13 (1·3%) of 990 participants reported moderate and severe neuropsychiatric adverse events in the varenicline group, 22 (2·2%) of 989 in the bupropion group, 25 (2·5%) of 1006 in the nicotine patch group, and 24 (2·4%) of 999 in the placebo group. The varenicline-placebo and bupropion-placebo risk differences (RDs) for moderate and severe neuropsychiatric adverse events were -1·28 (95% CI -2·40 to -0·15) and -0·08 (-1·37 to 1·21), respectively; the RDs for comparisons with nicotine patch were -1·07 (-2·21 to 0·08) and 0·13 (-1·19 to 1·45), respectively. In the psychiatric cohort, moderate and severe neuropsychiatric adverse events were reported in 67 (6·5%) of 1026 participants in the varenicline group, 68 (6·7%) of 1017 in the bupropion group, 53 (5·2%) of 1016 in the nicotine patch group, and 50 (4·9%) of 1015 in the placebo group. The varenicline-placebo and bupropion-placebo RDs were 1·59 (95% CI -0·42 to 3·59) and 1·78 (-0·24 to 3·81), respectively; the RDs versus nicotine patch were 1·22 (-0·81 to 3·25) and 1·42 (-0·63 to 3·46), respectively. Varenicline-treated participants achieved higher abstinence rates than those on placebo (odds ratio [OR] 3·61, 95% CI 3·07 to 4·24), nicotine patch (1·68, 1·46 to 1·93), and bupropion (1·75, 1·52 to 2·01). Those on bupropion and nicotine patch achieved higher abstinence rates than those on placebo (OR 2·07 [1·75 to 2·45] and 2·15 [1·82 to 2·54], respectively). Across cohorts, the most frequent adverse events by treatment group were nausea (varenicline, 25% [511 of 2016 participants]), insomnia (bupropion, 12% [245 of 2006 participants]), abnormal dreams (nicotine patch, 12% [251 of 2022 participants]), and headache (placebo, 10% [199 of 2014 participants]). Efficacy treatment comparison did not differ by cohort.
The study did not show a significant increase in neuropsychiatric adverse events attributable to varenicline or bupropion relative to nicotine patch or placebo. Varenicline was more effective than placebo, nicotine patch, and bupropion in helping smokers achieve abstinence, whereas bupropion and nicotine patch were more effective than placebo.
Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline.
人们对戒烟药物伐伦克林和安非他酮的神经精神安全性提出了大量担忧。它们相对于尼古丁贴片的疗效在很大程度上依赖于间接比较,而在有精神障碍的吸烟者中,关于安全性和疗效的信息有限。我们比较了伐伦克林和安非他酮与尼古丁贴片和安慰剂在有和没有精神障碍的吸烟者中的相对神经精神安全性风险和疗效。
我们进行了一项随机、双盲、三盲、安慰剂对照和阳性对照(尼古丁贴片;每天 21 毫克逐渐减少)的试验,共有 16 个国家的 140 个中心(临床研究中心、学术中心和门诊诊所)的 8144 名有戒烟意愿的吸烟者和无戒烟意愿的吸烟者参与,其中有精神障碍的吸烟者和无精神障碍的吸烟者各 4074 名和 3984 名,在 12 周的治疗期后进行 12 周的非治疗随访。每次就诊时,参与者都接受简短的戒烟咨询。随机分组采用计算机生成(1:1:1:1 比例)。参与者、研究人员和研究人员对治疗分配情况进行了屏蔽。主要终点是中度和重度神经精神不良事件的综合发生率。主要疗效终点是第 9-12 周生化确认的连续戒烟。所有随机分配的参与者均纳入疗效分析,接受治疗的参与者均纳入安全性分析。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov(编号 NCT01456936)注册,现已关闭。
8144 名参与者被随机分配,其中 4074 名被分配到精神障碍队列(4074 名纳入安全性分析),4028 名被分配到非精神障碍队列(3984 名纳入安全性分析)。在非精神障碍队列中,990 名参与者中有 13 名(1.3%)报告了中度和重度神经精神不良事件,989 名参与者中有 22 名(2.2%)报告了中度和重度神经精神不良事件,1006 名参与者中有 25 名(2.5%)报告了中度和重度神经精神不良事件,999 名参与者中有 24 名(2.4%)报告了中度和重度神经精神不良事件。伐伦克林与安慰剂相比,中度和重度神经精神不良事件的风险差异(RD)为-1.28(95%CI-2.40 至-0.15),安非他酮与安慰剂相比为-0.08(-1.37 至 1.21);与尼古丁贴片相比,RD 分别为-1.07(-2.21 至 0.08)和 0.13(-1.19 至 1.45)。在精神障碍队列中,1026 名参与者中有 67 名(6.5%)报告了中度和重度神经精神不良事件,1017 名参与者中有 68 名(6.7%)报告了中度和重度神经精神不良事件,1016 名参与者中有 53 名(5.2%)报告了中度和重度神经精神不良事件,1015 名参与者中有 50 名(4.9%)报告了中度和重度神经精神不良事件。伐伦克林与安慰剂相比,RD 为 1.59(95%CI-0.42 至 3.59),安非他酮与安慰剂相比,RD 为 1.78(-0.24 至 3.81);与尼古丁贴片相比,RD 分别为 1.22(-0.81 至 3.25)和 1.42(-0.63 至 3.46)。与安慰剂相比,接受伐伦克林治疗的参与者的戒烟率更高(比值比[OR]3.61,95%CI3.07 至 4.24)、尼古丁贴片(1.68,1.46 至 1.93)和安非他酮(1.75,1.52 至 2.01)。与安慰剂相比,接受安非他酮和尼古丁贴片治疗的参与者的戒烟率更高(OR2.07[1.75 至 2.45]和 2.15[1.82 至 2.54])。在各个队列中,最常见的不良事件按治疗组依次为恶心(伐伦克林,25%[2016 名参与者中的 511 名])、失眠(安非他酮,12%[2006 名参与者中的 245 名])、异常梦境(尼古丁贴片,12%[2022 名参与者中的 251 名])和头痛(安慰剂,10%[2014 名参与者中的 199 名])。疗效治疗比较不因队列而异。
研究未显示伐伦克林或安非他酮的神经精神不良事件发生率与尼古丁贴片或安慰剂相比有显著增加。伐伦克林在帮助吸烟者戒烟方面比安慰剂、尼古丁贴片和安非他酮更有效,而安非他酮和尼古丁贴片比安慰剂更有效。
辉瑞和葛兰素史克。