Verlinden Wim, Bourgeois Stefan, Gigase Pierre, Thienpont Clara, Vonghia Luisa, Vanwolleghem Thomas, Michielsen Peter, Francque Sven
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, BelgiumLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, BelgiumDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Jun;35(6):1299-308. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.08066. Epub 2016 May 5.
A few studies have evaluated real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) for assessing liver fibrosis by measuring liver stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but they excluded human immunodeficiency virus/HCV-coinfected patients. We investigated the diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measured by SWE as a noninvasive predictor of liver fibrosis in HCV using liver biopsy as a reference standard, including monoinfected and coinfected patients.
We measured liver stiffness in patients with HCV undergoing liver biopsy (METAVIR fibrosis staging).
Eighty patients (53 monoinfected and 27 coinfected) were included. There was a significant correlation between liver stiffness and fibrosis stage (ρ = 0.685; P < .001). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.841, 0.879, and 0.975 when comparing fibrosis stages F0-F1 versus F2-F4, F0-F2 versus F3-F4, and F0-F3 versus F4, respectively. Suggested cutoff values were 8.5 kPa for F2, 10.4 kPa for F3, and 11.3 kPa for F4, with sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 84%, 81% and 95%, and 100% and 90%. There was no significant difference between the liver stiffness of monoinfected and coinfected patients (P = .453). When combining SWE with the fibrosis-4 score, accuracy increased from 82% to 88% and from 88% to 96%, with incongruent results of 26% and 29%, for F0-F1 versus F2-F4 and F0-F2 versus F3-F4.
Shear wave elastography of the liver is an effective noninvasive predictor of liver fibrosis in patients with HCV. There was no significant difference between monoinfected and coinfected patients; hence, the same cutoff values can be used for both groups. Combination of SWE with the fibrosis-4 score leads to higher accuracy, although at the expense of inconclusive results in some patients.
有一些研究通过测量慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者的肝脏硬度,评估实时剪切波弹性成像(SWE)对肝纤维化的诊断价值,但这些研究排除了人类免疫缺陷病毒/HCV合并感染患者。我们以肝活检作为参考标准,研究了SWE测量的肝脏硬度作为HCV肝纤维化无创预测指标的诊断性能,纳入了单一感染和合并感染患者。
我们对接受肝活检(METAVIR纤维化分期)的HCV患者测量肝脏硬度。
共纳入80例患者(53例单一感染,27例合并感染)。肝脏硬度与纤维化分期之间存在显著相关性(ρ = 0.685;P <.001)。在比较纤维化分期F0 - F1与F2 - F4、F0 - F2与F3 - F4、F0 - F3与F4时,受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.841、0.879和0.975。F2、F3、F4的建议截断值分别为8.5 kPa、10.4 kPa和11.3 kPa,敏感性和特异性分别为81%和84%、81%和95%、100%和90%。单一感染和合并感染患者的肝脏硬度无显著差异(P = 0.453)。当将SWE与纤维化-4评分相结合时,对于F0 - F1与F2 - F4以及F0 - F2与F3 - F4,准确性分别从82%提高到88%和从88%提高到96%,不一致结果分别为26%和29%。
肝脏剪切波弹性成像对HCV患者肝纤维化是一种有效的无创预测指标。单一感染和合并感染患者之间无显著差异;因此,两组可使用相同的截断值。SWE与纤维化-4评分相结合可提高准确性,尽管会导致部分患者结果不确定。